<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Conservative Republican Discussion Forums - Left vs. Right</title>
		<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/</link>
		<description>Political news, debate, issues</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:17:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>City Council Meetings to Begin With Muslim Prayers</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/city-council-meetings-begin-muslim-prayers-28453/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:51:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://www.thefoxnation.com/assets/imagecache/fox-nation-small/fox-nation/415_crescent_2.jpg  (http://www.thefoxnation.com/culture/2010/09/08/city-council-meetings-begin-muslim-prayers)  
 
  
*City Council Meetings to Begin With Muslim Prayers ...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.thefoxnation.com/culture/2010/09/08/city-council-meetings-begin-muslim-prayers" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.thefoxnation.com/assets/imagecache/fox-nation-small/fox-nation/415_crescent_2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a> <br />
<br />
 <br />
<b><a href="http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local-beat/Council-Meetings-to-Begin-with-Muslim-Prayers-102387499.html" target="_blank">City Council Meetings to Begin With Muslim Prayers </a></b><br />
 <br />
In the wake of the battle over a mosque at Ground Zero, a move by the Hartford City Councilis sure to have its critics.<br />
 <br />
The Council announced Tuesday that it has invited local imams to perform Islamic invocations at the beginning of the Council meetings in September.<br />
 <br />
An e-mail from the Common Council called it &quot;an act of solidarity with our Muslim brothers and sisters.&quot;<br />
 <br />
The email even referenced the ongoing issue in New York. &quot;One of the goals of the Council is to give a voice to the many diverse peoples of the City, which is especially important given the recent anti-Islam events throughout the country.&quot;<br />
 <br />
<b><a href="http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local-beat/Council-Meetings-to-Begin-with-Muslim-Prayers-102387499.html" target="_blank">Read The Full Article</a></b><br />
 <br />
 <br />
<b>How about the shrilling wail of an Islamic call to worship to open up city council meetings? Don't count on those whiney secular humanists to cry about &quot;separation of church and state&quot; the way they do during any recognition of Christian involvement in American heritage! I.E. the libs finally found a religion they like, or can at least tolerate.</b></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>Right Wing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/city-council-meetings-begin-muslim-prayers-28453/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sen. DeMint promotes deceptive balanced budget amendment!</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/sen-demint-promotes-deceptive-balanced-budget-amendment-28451/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:44:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>If there is any single issue which smokes out and identifies progressive thinking low life politicians, balancing the federal budget on an annual basis would surely be among the top ten picks. So, let us take a look at the most recent proposal to balance the annual budget to see if it is really...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>If there is any single issue which smokes out and identifies progressive thinking low life politicians, balancing the federal budget on an annual basis would surely be among the top ten picks. So, let us take a look at the most recent proposal to balance the annual budget to see if it is really designed to force an annually balanced federal budget.<br />
 <br />
Sen DeMint, [SC] introduced the following proposal on 2/4/2010 which has 16 co-sponsors:<br />
 <br />
Sen Burr, Richard [NC] <br />
Sen Chambliss, Saxby [GA]<br />
Sen Coburn, Tom [OK]<br />
Sen Cornyn, John [TX]<br />
Sen Crapo, Mike [ID]<br />
Sen Ensign, John [NV]<br />
Sen Enzi, Michael B. [WY]<br />
Sen Graham, Lindsey [SC]<br />
Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK]<br />
Sen Isakson, Johnny [GA]<br />
Sen Kyl, Jon [AZ]<br />
Sen LeMieux, George S. [FL]<br />
Sen McCain, John [AZ]<br />
Sen Risch, James E. [ID]<br />
Sen Sessions, Jeff [AL]<br />
Sen Vitter, David [LA]<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.J.RES.27:.." target="_blank"><b><u><font color="blue">S.J.RES.27 -- Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States</font></u></b></a><br />
 <br />
(editorial comments are in bold)<br />
 <br />
`Article--<br />
 <br />
`Section 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless three-fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts by a rollcall vote.<br />
<b>NOTE: Under Section 1, the amendment immediately states how it may be overruled by a three-fifths vote. </b><br />
 <br />
`Section 2. The limit on the debt of the United States held by the public shall not be increased, unless three-fifths of the whole number of each House shall provide by law for such an increase by a rollcall vote.<br />
<b>NOTE: Under Section 2, the very intentions for the amendment [putting an end to increasing the national debt] can be subverted by allowing Congress to increase the national debt without providing specific taxes equaling the increase in the national debt.</b><br />
 <br />
`Section 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the United States Government for that fiscal year in which total outlays do not exceed total receipts.<br />
<b>NOTE: Section 3 is absolutely meaningless and an illusion to portray fiscal responsibility. Have we not just learned with the recent health care proposal debate how <i>projected</i> figures can be manipulated by our Executive to portray legislation in which outlays and receipts are in balance when they are not?</b><br />
 <br />
`Section 4. A bill to increase the internal revenue shall require for final adoption in each House the concurrence of two-thirds of the whole number of that House by rollcall vote.<br />
<b>NOTE: While Section 4 discourages taxes to be increased by requiring a two-thirds vote in each House, the amendment encourages Congress to simply increase the national debt by a three fifths vote in both Houses.</b><br />
 <br />
 <br />
`Section 5. The Congress may waive the provisions of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in effect. The provisions of this article may be waived for any fiscal year in which the United States is engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and serious military threat to national security and is so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of the whole number of each House, which becomes law.<br />
<b>NOTE: The flimflamery under Section 5 is most remarkable. In addition to setting the amendment aside as stated in Section 1, a simple majority vote in each House may ignore the requirement to balance the budget by simply declaring an existing military conflict has caused an &#8220;imminent and serious military threat to national security&#8220;. Have we not just seen how this &#8220;crisis&#8221; scare tactic mentality has been used to plunder our federal treasury under TARP; how it has been used to bail out auto companies which have blood sucking unions, and used to increase the national debt beyond human comprehension?</b> <br />
 <br />
`Section 6. The Congress shall enforce and implement this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely on estimates of outlays and receipts.<br />
<b>NOTE: And here, under Section 6, we find the proposal&#8216;s crown jewel! It is proposed to be etched in stone [our Constitution] that the entire balanced budget act heretofore is to be based upon &#8220;estimates&#8221;. How sweet of the amendment&#8217;s supporters to be so confident in, e.g., the Office and Budget Management, which has just opened the door to Obamacare with its fuzzy math &#8216;estimates&#8221; which are now known, beyond the shadow of doubt, to be nothing more than mathematical alchemy to allow additional unsustainable spending and borrowing.</b><br />
 <br />
`Section 7. Total receipts shall include all receipts of the United States Government except those derived from borrowing. Total outlays shall include all outlays of the United States Government except for those for repayment of debt principal.<br />
<b>NOTE: And what happens when total receipts derived from borrowing far exceed those for repayment of debt principal?</b><br />
 <br />
`Section 8. The provisions of this article respecting the internal revenue shall take effect upon the date of ratification of this article. The remaining provisions of this article shall take effect beginning with the later of the second fiscal year beginning after its ratification or the first fiscal year beginning after December 31, 2015.'.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
Bottom line is, Senator DeMint and his 16 co-sponsors are perpetrating a fraud which is titled &#8220;a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States&#8220;. The truth is, the proposal neither compels an annual balanced budget, nor requires equal taxes to finance increases in the national debt.<br />
 <br />
And just for the record, let it be known that our existing Constitution already provides a specific method [an apportioned tax among the States] to deal with annual deficits should Congress borrow to meet its expenditures. But our progressive thinking RINOs, and the fans of an ever expanding and bloated federal government, fear the wisdom of our founding father&#8217;s instructions for dealing with deficits. Our founder&#8217;s instructions, if followed, would bring to a grinding halt the plundering of our national treasury, end Congress&#8217;s irresponsible spending and borrowing, and above all, would make every member of Congress immediately accountable to their State&#8217;s Governor and Legislature should Congress engage in irresponsible deficit spending, in which case, each state&#8217;s Congressional Delegation would have to return home with a bill for their State to pay to extinguish any deficit Congress created during the year by Congress. And, each State&#8217;s share of the bill is pre determined by our Constitution&#8217;s <b><i>fair share formula:</i></b><br />
 <br />
<b>States&#8217; population</b><br />
<b>---------------------------- X ANNUAL DEFICIT = STATE&#8217;S SHARE</b><br />
<b>Total U.S. Population</b><br />
 <br />
As you can see, there are no gimmicks under our founder&#8217;s no nonsense remedy. It&#8217;s pay to play all the way! For a summary of our Founder&#8217;s original tax plan see: <a href="http://townshipnews.org/?p=1360" target="_blank"><b><u><font color="blue">CLICK HERE</font></u></b></a>. And for historical documentation of the apportioned tax <a href="http://files.meetup.com/574256/IB%2309%20State%20Rate%20Tax.pdf" target="_blank"><b><u><font color="blue">CLICK HERE</font></u></b></a>.<br />
 <br />
JWK<br />
 <br />
<b><i>&#8220;&#8230;a national revenue must be obtained; but the system must be such a one, that, while it secures the object of revenue it shall not be oppressive to our constituents.&#8221;___ </i>Madison, during the creation of our <a href="http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llac&amp;fileName=001/llac001.db&amp;recNum=55" target="_blank"><u><font color="blue">Nation&#8217;s first revenue raising Act</font></u></a></b></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>johnwk</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/sen-demint-promotes-deceptive-balanced-budget-amendment-28451/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Holder Investigating 5 Anti-Muslim Acts</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/holder-investigating-5-anti-muslim-acts-28449/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:29:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*Holder Investigating 5 Anti-Muslim Acts  (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/07/AR2010090704709.html)* 
 
*WASHINGTON -- *The Justice Department is investigating a handful of apparently anti-Muslim incidents in four states, including the stabbing of a Muslim cab driver in...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/07/AR2010090704709.html" target="_blank">Holder Investigating 5 Anti-Muslim Acts </a></b><br />
<br />
<b>WASHINGTON -- </b>The Justice Department is investigating a handful of apparently anti-Muslim incidents in four states, including the stabbing of a Muslim cab driver in New York City.<br />
 <br />
FBI agents and civil rights division investigators also are looking into vandalism and other incidents at mosques or mosque construction sites in Arlington, Texas; Murfreesboro, Tenn.; Madera, Calif.; and Waterport, N.Y.<br />
 <br />
The open criminal investigations were confirmed by civil rights division spokeswoman Xochitl (SOH-chee) Hinojosa in response to a query from The Associated Press.<br />
 <br />
Attorney General Eric Holder met Tuesday with Muslim and other religious leaders to discuss the attacks and the uproar over a planned mosque near ground zero in New York. <br />
<br />
<b><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/07/AR2010090704709.html" target="_blank">Read The Full Article</a></b><br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
<b>As it is reported Iran is paying bounty money for U.S. soldiers to be killed, a Ha-mosque is on the verge of being built near Ground Zero in which the imam is connected to Hamas, Hezbollah is operating on our southern border, and we are at war with Islamic terrorists, Eric Holder will ignore all of this and spend his time investigating anti-Islam hate crimes.  I wonder whose side he's on?</b></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>Right Wing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/holder-investigating-5-anti-muslim-acts-28449/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Now we are getting ridiculous</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/now-we-getting-ridiculous-28448/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:15:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*NOW WE ARE GETTING RIDICULOUS (http://boortz.com/nealz_nuze/2010/08/now-we-are-getting-ridiculous.html)* 
  
  
Image: http://boortz.com/images/2010/08/whats_right_with_islam_rauf_m.jpg  
  
First we learned that the imam spearheading the Ground Zero mosque, Imam Faisal (Fuzzy) Abdul Rauf, is...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b><a href="http://boortz.com/nealz_nuze/2010/08/now-we-are-getting-ridiculous.html" target="_blank">NOW WE ARE GETTING RIDICULOUS</a></b><br />
 <br />
 <br />
<img src="http://boortz.com/images/2010/08/whats_right_with_islam_rauf_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
 <br />
First we learned that the imam spearheading the Ground Zero mosque, Imam Faisal (Fuzzy) Abdul Rauf, is currently on a taxpayer funded trip to the Middle East. What is he doing over there? I presume that he is raising funds for his mosque .. or as Florida Moonbat Alan Grayson likes to call it, &quot;his health club.&quot; Yeah, health club my left butt cheek. But as if sending Imam Fuzzy on a taxpayer-funded trip wasn't bad enough, <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/and-now-daisy-khans-12000-taxpayer-funded-trip-to-the-uae/" target="_blank">we are now going to send Mrs. Fuzzy on a trip as well.</a><br />
The State Department is sending Daisy Khan, Imam Fuzzy's wife, to the United Arab Emirates to talk about her views about Muslim life in America. Hmmm I wonder what she is going to say? Well .. over the weekend she described the outcry against her beloved mosque as &quot;beyond Islamophobia. It's hate of Muslims.&quot; Now if that is what she told an American audience can you just imagine what she is going to say once she is on her own turf amongst her own people? Oh yeah ... she's really going to be such a great ambassador for the country that is fighting her husband's Mosque. <br />
Go back to my previous bit about Obama being a Muslim ... or not. Another point .. Obama's State Department seems to be anxious to send Muslims abroad on the taxpayer's dime to speak to Muslims about being Muslim in America? Yeah .. that really quells the rumors, doesn't it?<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://boortz.com/nealz_nuze/2010/08/now-we-are-getting-ridiculous.html" target="_blank">NOW WE ARE GETTING RIDICULOUS - Nealz Nuze on boortz.com</a><br />
 <br />
<b>Good points from the talkmaster. It is getting harder for the chancellor to make the case he is not a Muslim.</b></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>Right Wing</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/now-we-getting-ridiculous-28448/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Can anyone see a dichotomy here?</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/can-anyone-see-dichotomy-here-28446/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:59:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Our government has come out against the church that wants to burn the Koran and at the same time see no problem with building a Muslim mosque at ground zero. 
  
  
Koran: Priest Terry Jones Will Burn The Koran On 9/11 Despite White House Condemnation | World News | Sky News...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Our government has come out against the church that wants to burn the Koran and at the same time see no problem with building a Muslim mosque at ground zero.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Koran-Priest-Terry-Jones-Will-Burn-The-Koran-On-9-11-Despite-White-House-Condemnation/Article/201009115719584?lpos=World_News_Carousel_Region_1&amp;lid=ARTICLE_15719584_Koran%3A_Priest_Terry_Jones_Will_Burn_The_Koran_On_911_Despite_White_House_Condemnation" target="_blank">Koran: Priest Terry Jones Will Burn The Koran On 9/11 Despite White House Condemnation | World News | Sky News</a><br />
 <br />
<a href="http://bigpeace.com/fgaffney/2010/08/13/obamas-ground-zero-mosque/" target="_blank">Obama</a></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/can-anyone-see-dichotomy-here-28446/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A look into our future</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/look-into-our-future-28445/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:17:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Chinese steel mills and mobile phone factories are being idled and thousands of homes in one area are doing without electricity as local governments order power cuts to meet energy-saving targets set by Beijing.  
Rolling blackouts and enforced power cuts are affecting key industrial areas. The...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Chinese steel mills and mobile phone factories are being idled and thousands of homes in one area are doing without electricity as local governments order power cuts to meet energy-saving targets set by Beijing. <br />
Rolling blackouts and enforced power cuts are affecting key industrial areas. The prosperous eastern city of Taizhou turned off street lights and ordered hotels and shopping malls to cut power use. In Anping County southwest of Beijing, an area known as China's wire-manufacturing capital, thousands of factories and homes have endured daylong blackouts over the past two weeks.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100908/D9I3MD9O0.html" target="_blank">My Way News - China blacks out towns to meet energy goal</a><br />
 <br />
If Obama manages to get his cap and trade nonsense passed this is a possibility</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/look-into-our-future-28445/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Report: Iran pays $1,000 for each U.S. soldier killed by the Taliban</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/report-iran-pays-1-000-each-u-s-soldier-killed-taliban-28443/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Report: Iran pays $1,000 for each U.S. soldier killed by the Taliban (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39014669/ns/world_news-south_and_central_asia/) 
msnbc.com staff and news service reports (inc. Reuters) 
9/10 
 
---Quote--- 
 Iran is paying Taliban fighters $1,000 for each U.S. soldier they kill in...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39014669/ns/world_news-south_and_central_asia/" target="_blank">Report: Iran pays $1,000 for each U.S. soldier killed by the Taliban</a><br />
msnbc.com staff and news service reports (inc. Reuters)<br />
9/10<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			 Iran is paying Taliban fighters $1,000 for each U.S. soldier they kill in Afghanistan, according to a report in a British newspaper.<br />
<br />
The Sunday Times described how a man it said was a &quot;Taliban treasurer&quot; had gone to collect $18,000 from an Iranian firm in Kabul, a reward it said was for an attack in July which killed several Afghan government troops and destroyed an American armored vehicle.<br />
<br />
The treasurer left with the cash hidden in a sack of flour, the newspaper said, and then gave it to Taliban fighters in the province of Wardak. In the past six months, the treasurer claimed to have collected more than $77,000 from the company.<br />
<br />
The Sunday Times said its investigation had found that at least five Kabul-based Iranian companies were secretly passing funds to the Taliban.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> More fruit from that hopey-changey engagey thingy!</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>PeteS in CA</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/report-iran-pays-1-000-each-u-s-soldier-killed-taliban-28443/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Another party at the White House--You are all invited</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/another-party-white-house-you-all-invited-28437/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:39:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The stately White House East Room, home to many a bill signing and ceremonial gathering, becomes a stage Tuesday for pirouettes, jetes, gravity-defying leaps and maybe even some bumps and grinds as Michelle Obama inaugurates a new dance series. 
Dancers of all types — ballet, modern, hip hop and...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The stately White House East Room, home to many a bill signing and ceremonial gathering, becomes a stage Tuesday for pirouettes, jetes, gravity-defying leaps and maybe even some bumps and grinds as Michelle Obama inaugurates a new dance series.<br />
Dancers of all types — ballet, modern, hip hop and Broadway — take over the room, first for an afternoon workshop, during which students from around the country will have the chance to work with some of the biggest names in dance.<br />
Then, after a short break, the students return to see their mentors perform in an hour-long, star-studded show. Even Broadway's young &quot;Billy Elliot&quot; will be there — four Billys actually, from the show's rotating cast.<br />
But the main attraction is the Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater, and that's because its celebrated artistic director, Judith Jamison, soon to retire after two decades in the job, is the honoree of the event.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100907/ap_on_en_ot/us_white_house_dance_1" target="_blank">Michelle Obama hosts first White House dance event - Yahoo! News</a><br />
 <br />
I have to wonder who will pay for these parties after the big O's only term in office.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/another-party-white-house-you-all-invited-28437/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Will you pay my taxes?</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/will-you-pay-my-taxes-28436/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:40:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>One thing stands out clearly as I cruise the internet and that I see article after article with democrats saying that more taxes need to be paid.  They point to the national debt and claim it does not matter since they need more money for entitlement programs.  They insist that the tax burden is...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>One thing stands out clearly as I cruise the internet and that I see article after article with democrats saying that more taxes need to be paid.  They point to the national debt and claim it does not matter since they need more money for entitlement programs.  They insist that the tax burden is the lowest since 1950 and that if we do not raise taxes the the nation will not flourish.<br />
 <br />
Since history has shown us that higher taxes end up costing the nation  economically and there are past examples to prove this the talk of raising taxes does nothing but hope that a different outcome comes from doing the same thing.  In a recent post RET said the same thing. The eventual outcome is added revenue from taxes are not used to pay down the debt but utilized  for more social programs.<br />
 <br />
Okay for a little reality here, while democrats call for more taxes they really mean they want others to pay it while they escape the added burden themselves.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/will-you-pay-my-taxes-28436/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>overwhelm, socialize, destroy.</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/overwhelm-socialize-destroy-28435/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:16:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Another good email from my boss. 
  
Snopes link    snopes.com: Obama's Agenda: Overwhelm the System (http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/overwhelm.asp) 
 
WAYNE ALLYN ROOT: Overwhelm the system 
 
 Barrack Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is 
brilliant. He knows...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Another good email from my boss.<br />
 <br />
<font face="Calibri"><font size="2">Snopes link    <a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/overwhelm.asp" target="_blank">snopes.com: Obama's Agenda: Overwhelm the System</a></font></font><br />
<font face="Arial"><font size="2"><font face="Arial"><br />
WAYNE ALLYN ROOT: Overwhelm the system<br />
<br />
 Barrack Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is<br />
brilliant. He knows exactly what he's doing. He is purposely overwhelming<br />
the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social<br />
chaos -- thereby destroying capitalism and our country from within.<br />
<br />
 Barack Obama is my college classmate ( Columbia University , class of<br />
'83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is following<br />
the plan of Cloward &amp; Piven, two professors at Columbia University . They<br />
outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system with<br />
government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the clues below.<br />
Taken individually they're alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant,<br />
Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a<br />
socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs<br />
government for survival ... and can be counted on to always vote for<br />
bigger government. Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.<br />
<br />
 -- Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do with<br />
health care.  It had everything to do with unionizing millions of<br />
hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 new<br />
IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama doesn't care<br />
that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will add trillions<br />
to the national debt. What he does care about is that it cements the<br />
dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big government.<br />
Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless spending bill<br />
in the middle of a depression?<br />
<br />
 -- Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do with<br />
health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming. It has<br />
everything to do with redistribution of income, government control of the<br />
economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest contributors. Those<br />
powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which owns NBC,<br />
MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama wants.<br />
They will kickback hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to<br />
Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them in power. The bonus is that<br />
all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars, bigger homes and<br />
businesses helps Obama &quot;spread the wealth around.&quot;<br />
<br />
 -- Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state? Who's<br />
asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government entitlement<br />
addicts in the middle of a depression?  Certainly not American taxpayers.<br />
But this has been Obama's plan all along. His goal is to add two new<br />
Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal<br />
Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.<br />
<br />
 -- Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12 million<br />
potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm the system<br />
and bankrupt America . But it adds 12 million reliable new Democrat<br />
voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add another few<br />
trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, food stamps, free<br />
medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and eventually Social<br />
Security.<br />
<br />
 -- Stimulus and bailouts. Where did all that money go? It went to<br />
Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions -- including<br />
billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees across<br />
the country. It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their employees<br />
could keep paying union dues. It went to AIG so that Goldman Sachs could<br />
be bailed out (after giving Obama almost $1 million in contributions). A<br />
staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby protecting their union<br />
dues). All those public employees will vote loyally Democrat to protect<br />
their bloated salaries and pensions that are bankrupting America . The<br />
country goes broke, future generations face a bleak future, but Obama,<br />
the Democrat Party, government, and the unions grow more powerful. The<br />
ends justify the means.<br />
<br />
 -- Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and job<br />
creators. Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of taxpayers,<br />
redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those who did nothing<br />
to deserve it (except vote for Obama). Reagan wanted to dramatically cut<br />
taxes in order to starve the government. Obama wants to dramatically<br />
raise taxes to starve his political opposition.<br />
<br />
 With the acts outlined above, Obama and his regime have created a vast<br />
and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government;<br />
a vast privileged class of public employees who work for big government;<br />
and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing<br />
themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming the system.<br />
<br />
 Add it up and you've got the perfect Marxist scheme -- all devised by my<br />
Columbia University college classmate Barack Obama using the Cloward and<br />
Piven Plan.</font></font></font></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>clockwork</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/overwhelm-socialize-destroy-28435/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Our Quick-Fix Electorate -- Eugene Robinson</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/our-quick-fix-electorate-eugene-robinson-28431/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:28:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Our Quick-Fix Electorate (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/09/03/our_quick-fix_electorate_106996.html) 
By Eugene Robinson 
RealClearPolitics 
9/3/10 
 
---Quote--- 
WASHINGTON -- According to polls, Americans are in a mood to hold their breath until they turn blue. Voters appear to...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/09/03/our_quick-fix_electorate_106996.html" target="_blank">Our Quick-Fix Electorate</a><br />
By Eugene Robinson<br />
RealClearPolitics<br />
9/3/10<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			WASHINGTON -- According to polls, Americans are in a mood to hold their breath until they turn blue. Voters appear to be so fed up with the Democrats that they're ready to toss them out in favor of the Republicans -- for whom, according to those same polls, the nation has even greater contempt. This isn't an &quot;electoral wave,&quot; it's a temper tantrum.<br />
...<br />
My guess is that with a decided advantage in campaign funds, along with the other advantages of incumbency, Democrats will be able to mitigate these prospective losses -- perhaps even relieving Nancy Pelosi of the hassles of moving. But there's no mistaking the public mood, and the truth is that it makes no sense.<br />
<br />
In the punditry business, it's considered bad form to question the essential wisdom of the American people. But at this point, it's impossible to ignore the obvious: The American people are acting like a bunch of spoiled brats.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> The revulsion against Rs in 2006 and the blind leap into &quot;Hope and Change&quot; was mature, wise. But rejection of Pres. Obama and the D Congress? A &quot;temper tantrum&quot; &quot;that makes no sense&quot; by &quot;spoiled brats&quot;!</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>PeteS in CA</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/our-quick-fix-electorate-eugene-robinson-28431/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>‘Machete’ producers lied about racist bloodbath</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/machete-producers-lied-about-racist-bloodbath-28430/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:23:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[‘Machete’ producers lied about racist bloodbath (http://www.prisonplanet.com/%E2%80%98machete%E2%80%99-producers-lied-about-racist-bloodbath.html) 
Aaron Dykes & Alex Jones 
Prison Planet.com 
Sunday, September 5, 2010 
 
---Quote--- 
‘Machete’ reached the #3 spot at the box office  opening...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/%E2%80%98machete%E2%80%99-producers-lied-about-racist-bloodbath.html" target="_blank">‘Machete’ producers lied about racist bloodbath</a><br />
Aaron Dykes &amp; Alex Jones<br />
Prison Planet.com<br />
Sunday, September 5, 2010<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			‘Machete’ reached the #3 spot at the box office  opening weekend. But after viewing the film, it is clear that its producers lied about the extent of the film’s racial message, which includes vulgar atrocities, including the killing of a pregnant woman attempting to cross the border during one of the opening scenes. This deception about the film’s message could bring its tax incentives, worth millions in production costs, into question.<br />
...<br />
Now there is no doubt. Everything Jones quoted from the script  was on screen in one form or another– and its tone was clear: opposition to illegal immigration is tantamount to murder, white racism and vile Machiavellian scheming.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> Sounds truly charming ... the Hollyweird take on ordinary people's views ... the very ordinary people whose $$ was extorted by the IRS to help pay for this POS.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>PeteS in CA</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/machete-producers-lied-about-racist-bloodbath-28430/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>U.S. is drowning in  debt--Obama wants more money</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/u-s-drowning-debt-obama-wants-more-money-28429/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:17:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per) is asking Congress to approve at least $50 billion in long-term spending in the nation's roads, railways and runways in a pre-election effort to show he's...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>WASHINGTON (AP) -- President <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per" target="_blank"><font color="#004276">Barack Obama</font></a> is asking Congress to approve at least $50 billion in long-term spending in the nation's roads, railways and runways in a pre-election effort to show he's trying to stimulate the sputtering economy. <br />
The infrastructure spending is part of a package of targeted proposals the White House announced on Monday. With November's elections for control of Congress approaching, Obama planned to discuss the proposal later Monday at a <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/l/labor_day/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier" target="_blank"><font color="#004276">Labor Day</font></a> event in Milwaukee. <br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/09/06/us/politics/AP-US-Obama-Economy.html?_r=1&amp;hp" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010...y.html?_r=1&amp;hp</a><br />
I would say Obama will never learn</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/u-s-drowning-debt-obama-wants-more-money-28429/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Obama is not a muslim</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/obama-not-muslim-28428/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:34:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The nonsense about President Obama being a Muslim has got to stop. I rise to defend him from this absurd accusation by pointing out that he is obviously an atheist.  
 
Leave aside Obama's fanatical opposition to allowing Illinois hospitals to save the lives of babies with God-given souls...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The nonsense about President Obama being a Muslim has got to stop. I rise to defend him from this absurd accusation by pointing out that he is obviously an atheist. <br />
<br />
Leave aside Obama's fanatical opposition to allowing Illinois hospitals to save the lives of babies with God-given souls inadvertently born alive during abortions. Also leave aside the fact that neither of his parents were Christians. And leave aside his current crop of &quot;spiritual advisers,&quot; which is a collection of Mother Earth worshippers, polytheists and other nonbelievers. <br />
 <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.anncoulter.com/" target="_blank">Welcome to AnnCoulter.com</a></div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/obama-not-muslim-28428/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Obama buying ground zero Iman's book]]></title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/obama-buying-ground-zero-imans-book-28427/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The Senate Foreign Relations Committee wants the State Department to explain its use of taxpayer funds to purchase and distribute Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf’s book What’s Right With Islam.  
 
“Certainly Senate Foreign Relations Committee members will want some briefing from the State Department,” Andy...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The Senate Foreign Relations Committee wants the State Department to explain its use of taxpayer funds to purchase and distribute Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf’s book <i>What’s Right With Islam. </i><br />
<br />
“Certainly Senate Foreign Relations Committee members will want some briefing from the State Department,” Andy Fisher, the spokesman for Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations told HUMAN EVENTS. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass), the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, had no immediate reaction to the controversy.<br />
 <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38802" target="_blank">State Dept. Pressed for Imam Book Explanation - HUMAN EVENTS</a>-<br />
 <br />
 <br />
Is anyone surprised?</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/">Left vs. Right</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/left-vs-right-10/obama-buying-ground-zero-imans-book-28427/</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
