<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Conservative Republican Discussion Forums -  Science Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/</link>
		<description>A place for the real geeky stuff</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:40:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Liability for climate change</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/liability-climate-change-28413/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:33:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Liability for climate change (http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727752.600-liability-for-climate-change.html) 
New Scientist 
8/25/10 
 
---Quote--- 
WHEN extreme weather strikes, such as the floods in Pakistan, the null hypothesis is to assume that humans have not played a role, then figure...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727752.600-liability-for-climate-change.html" target="_blank">Liability for climate change</a><br />
New Scientist<br />
8/25/10<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			WHEN extreme weather strikes, such as the floods in Pakistan, the null hypothesis is to assume that humans have not played a role, then figure out if they did.<br />
<br />
That's the opposite of what should be done, argues Kevin Trenberth of the US National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado. We should assume global warming plays a role in every climate event, then ask whether that role is a significant one. The view is likely to be controversial, but a government-convened meeting last week suggests that it is gaining favour (see &quot;Time to blame climate change for extreme weather&quot;).
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> It's amazing what you learn when you decide in advance what it will be! The interesting point here is that Trenberth states that climate &quot;scientists&quot; are doing exactly that.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/"> Science Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>PeteS in CA</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/liability-climate-change-28413/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ST Louis Arch deteriorating</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/st-louis-arch-deteriorating-28254/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 03:06:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[This symbol of man's achievement is suffering the ravages of time and needs to be looked over to keep it from rusting out 
  
Gateway Arch showing rust and decay (http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_75095ba4-2d7d-5811-b4f9-a7ce769ddb0d.html) 
  
I went up in the Arch back in 1976 and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This symbol of man's achievement is suffering the ravages of time and needs to be looked over to keep it from rusting out<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_75095ba4-2d7d-5811-b4f9-a7ce769ddb0d.html" target="_blank">Gateway Arch showing rust and decay</a><br />
 <br />
I went up in the Arch back in 1976 and since then nature has proved to be  the champion when it comes to man's endeavors to create something to last.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/"> Science Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/st-louis-arch-deteriorating-28254/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Private spaceship carrier plane damaged in test</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/private-spaceship-carrier-plane-damaged-test-28238/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:14:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Landing gear reportedly collapsed on runway 
* Manufacturer Scaled Composites calls accident 'minor' 
* Spaceship was not attached to plane during accident 
By Irene Klotz 
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., Aug 20 (Reuters) - An aircraft designed to launch Virgin Galactic's suborbital passenger spaceship was...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Landing gear reportedly collapsed on runway<br />
* Manufacturer Scaled Composites calls accident 'minor'<br />
* Spaceship was not attached to plane during accident<br />
By Irene Klotz<br />
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., Aug 20 (Reuters) - An aircraft designed to launch Virgin Galactic's suborbital passenger spaceship was damaged in an accident on a California runway, manufacturer Scaled Composites said.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSB68371720100820" target="_blank">Private spaceship carrier plane damaged in test | Reuters</a><br />
 <br />
This civilian effort may be the only thing that is keeping us in the space exploration game</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/"> Science Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/private-spaceship-carrier-plane-damaged-test-28238/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Moon Is Shrinking</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/moon-shrinking-28233/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:45:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The moon is shrinking ever so slightly, but there is no cause for alarm, according to a new study that has discovered a clutch of previously unseen faults on the lunar surface from photos taken by a NASA probe.  
  
In all, 14 previously undetected small thrust faults -- the physical markers of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The moon is shrinking ever so slightly, but there is no cause for alarm, according to a new study that has discovered a clutch of previously unseen faults on the lunar surface from photos taken by a NASA probe. <br />
 <br />
In all, 14 previously undetected small thrust faults -- the physical markers of contraction on the lunar surface -- were found to be globally distributed around the moon in thousands of photos returned by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. <br />
 <br />
These fault structures -- called <i>lobate scarps </i>-- are among the <a href="http://www.space.com/php/multimedia/imagedisplay/img_display.php?pic=lobate-scarps-lunar-surface-100819-02.jpg&amp;cap=In+a+particularly+dramatic+example%2C+a+thrust+fault+pushed+crustal+materials+%28arrows%29+up+the+side+of+the+farside+impact+crater+named+Gregory+%282.1+degrees+N%2C+128.1+degrees+E%29.+By+mapping+the+distribution+and+determining+the+size+of+all+lobate+scarps%2C+the+tectonic+and+thermal+history+of+the+Moon+can+be+reconstructed+over+the+past+billion+years.+Credit%3A+NASA%2FGSFC%2FArizona+State+University%2FSmithsonian+&#91;%3Ca+href%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.space.com%2Fscienceastronomy%2Fshrinking-moon-new-lunar-photos-100819.html%3EFull+Story%3C%2Fa%3E]" target="_blank"><b>youngest landforms on the moon</b></a>. Their distribution across the lunar surface (as opposed to regional distribution) suggests that cooling in the moon's interior is the likely cause of the contraction, or shrinkage, said study leader Thomas Watters, a scientist with the Center for Earth and Planetary Studies at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. <br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/08/19/moon-shrinking-new-photos-reveal/" target="_blank">FOXNews.com - The Moon Is Shrinking</a><br />
 <br />
Being an neophyte myself I have to wonder if this tread will cause gravity fluctuations on the Earth eventually</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/"> Science Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/moon-shrinking-28233/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>More  3D movies in the works</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/more-3d-movies-works-28204/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:10:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>If this keeps up I guess the next thing is everyone will end up with 3D TVs.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>If this keeps up I guess the next thing is everyone will end up with 3D TVs.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/"> Science Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>samspade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/more-3d-movies-works-28204/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NOAA: Warmest June Ever! Caveat: We Made It Up</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/noaa-warmest-june-ever-caveat-we-made-up-28191/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>NOAA: Warmest June Ever! Caveat: We Made It Up (http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/noaa-warmest-june-ever-caveat-we-made-it-up/) 
August 15, 2010 - by Art Horn 
Pajamas Media 
 
---Quote--- 
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) claimed  that this past June was the warmest ever in...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/noaa-warmest-june-ever-caveat-we-made-it-up/" target="_blank">NOAA: Warmest June Ever! Caveat: We Made It Up</a><br />
August 15, 2010 - by Art Horn<br />
Pajamas Media<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) claimed  that this past June was the warmest ever in its temperature records, which go back to 1880. The global average temperature in June was 61.1 degrees, or 1.22 degrees Fahrenheit above the 20th century average of 59.9 degrees. At face value, this appears to be consistent with the theory that global warming is caused by mankind’s use of fossil fuels. But face value can be deceiving, and the value is not what it appears to be.<br />
<br />
In fact, the claim that June 2010 was the warmest on record has no value at all.<br />
<br />
NOAA gets its temperature data from the Goddard Institute for Space Studies. They calculate the average temperature of the Earth using data from land-based thermometers and ocean buoy and ship measurements of water temperature. However, there is a major problem with how GISS measures temperature in a very large region — the Arctic.<br />
<br />
The problem is that they don’t have any thermometers there. So they make it up. No, really!
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> While the Arctic probably doesn't have the number of micro-climates that Central CA does, to make temperature projects for that vast an area based on zero weather stations actually in the area is beyond ludicrous. It's scientific malpractice!</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/"> Science Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>PeteS in CA</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/noaa-warmest-june-ever-caveat-we-made-up-28191/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Inquiry on Harvard Lab Threatens Ripple Effect</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/inquiry-harvard-lab-threatens-ripple-effect-28177/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:55:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Inquiry on Harvard Lab Threatens Ripple Effect (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/13/education/13harvard.html?_r=2&ref=science) 
By NICHOLAS WADE 
The New York Yimes 
Published: August 12, 2010 
 
---Quote--- 
Harvard’s slow-motion inquiry about the laboratory of Marc Hauser, one of its star...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/13/education/13harvard.html?_r=2&amp;ref=science" target="_blank">Inquiry on Harvard Lab Threatens Ripple Effect</a><br />
By NICHOLAS WADE<br />
The New York Yimes<br />
Published: August 12, 2010<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			Harvard’s slow-motion inquiry about the laboratory of Marc Hauser, one of its star academics, has cast a shadow over the several different fields in which Dr. Hauser and his students published papers.<br />
<br />
So far only one of Dr. Hauser’s articles has been retracted, for unspecified reasons, and two have been amended. Harvard has given no reason for the retraction, leaving researchers to wonder whether that article alone was flawed or whether all of Dr. Hauser’s results are suspect. He and his students have published widely in fields ranging from animal communication to the nature of morality.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> This could be little more than a researcher being sloppy about documenting their results. Or it could be as much as rolling back much that we &quot;know&quot; in the field of primate research. <b><i>Minimally</i></b>, Harvard needs to make clear the scope and impact of their investigation!</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/"> Science Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>PeteS in CA</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/inquiry-harvard-lab-threatens-ripple-effect-28177/</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Global Warming, R.I.P.</title>
			<link>http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/global-warming-r-i-p-28115/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:49:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Global Warming, R.I.P. (http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/08/global_warming_rip.html) 
By Claude Sandroff 
American Thinker 
8/7/10 
 
---Quote--- 
In a remarkable monograph, Roy W. Spencer presents hard evidence that 75% of the observed warming since the start of the 20th  century is due to...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/08/global_warming_rip.html" target="_blank">Global Warming, R.I.P.</a><br />
By Claude Sandroff<br />
American Thinker<br />
8/7/10<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			In a remarkable monograph, Roy W. Spencer presents hard evidence that 75% of the observed warming since the start of the 20th  century is due to natural processes. He offers a detailed model describing how one of these processes, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), operates in the real world. Most importantly, he demonstrates that anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is a minor contributor to a global climate largely insensitive to man-made CO2. <br />
<br />
Thanks to this highly skilled climatologist and his The Great Global Warming Blunder: How Mother Nature Fooled The World's Top Climate Scientists, we can now taunt the often corrupt and overtly political planetary high priests with this: PDO means AGW is DOA.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div> Sounds like AGW skeptics are starting to formulate their own hypotheses accounting for what has been &quot;observed&quot;. I wonder what data set they use; if it's even possible, it would be a great service to reconstruct a DB of the past 100 years or so of temperature reports, with appendices tracking movements of stations and development around stations that skewed their readings.</div>

 ]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/"> Science Forum</category>
			<dc:creator>PeteS in CA</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.republicanoperative.com/forums/science-forum-31/global-warming-r-i-p-28115/</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
