Gay right issues

[fishoutofwater]

An animal cant consent to marriage. That argument is done.



OSU is right. You people are the ones pushing your views on the world. The gay people arent. You guys are the ones saying "no, thats wrong and you cant do it". Homosexuals arent doing that. They arent asking you to not marry eachother, marry certain people, or saying what your doing is wrong. You are...

Looks like it's halfway out of hand now, EV. Anway....

Too bad this is a government issue. We wouldn't be having this discussion at all if the government's nose was kept where it belongs -- out of our lives.

It would be a social argument, yes, which is where it belongs.

This made me

And then

I agree...Lithium and OSU are halfway out of hand Sorry, Rightwing...I couldn't resist...

[Dacabeti]

"Deviant" is subjective. The deviance of an issue is not relevant. Two adult males can give consent. Animals can not.

Deviant: deviating or departing from the norm; characterized by deviation: deviant social behavior.

[Cactus Jack]

Do you support a persons right to marry an animal? If you dont then your just another gay monkey trying to force your views on everyone else.

For the millionth time, animals cannot give consent.

As for deviancy, as long as it's between two consenting adults I see no problem with it. And it's none of your business.

[Dacabeti]

For the millionth time, animals cannot give consent.

As for deviancy, as long as it's between two consenting adults I see no problem with it. And it's none of your business.

One of my post is gone.

I take it you are ok with a mother marrying her son? 2 consenting adults after all. A man having 10 wives?

Also for the millionth time I have absolutely no problem what 2 consenting adults do in private.

[Volk]

One of my post is gone.

I take it you are ok with a mother marrying her son? 2 consenting adults after all. A man having 10 wives?

Also for the millionth time I have absolutely no problem what 2 consenting adults do in private.

The problem with incest is the children suffering genetic defects.

There are places in the US still where polygamous marriage occurs.

[OSUPhantom]

Comprehension issues?

I am saying that if you allow one deviant behavior you must allow ALL deviant behavior otherwise you are pushing your views on others.

You are the one that said that Mass was not
doing the school thing. I posted proof that it was. I always thought OSU's education was lacking. Thanks for the proof.

Oh my....I feel so ashamed, some nutjob has insulted my school...I would LOVE to see you try and get in here. I said it was not being taught widespread in MA schools, it's being taught in A SCHOOL. Trying to characterize a persons constitutional rights to equality as the same as incest is just plain stupid. Secondly, denying someone their rights because we are afraid of giving these god-given rights frankly makes you sound like a Democrat. Finally, the idea of being happy with civil unions is frankly laughable; "seperate but equal" was decided unconstitutional long ago....everyone needs to be allowed marriage or no one can. There is no seperate but equal here, sorry.

[Dacabeti]

The problem with incest is the children suffering genetic defects.

There are places in the US still where polygamous marriage occurs.

There are a many married couple that do not have children. You just made the assumption that marriage is the basis for raising children. When did gay men start getting pregnant? If you allow that Deviant behavior you must allow for ALL deviant behavior.

Are you ok with a mother who has a full hysterectomy marrying her son. What about a father marrying his sterile daughter?

[Volk]

There are a many married couple that do not have children. You just made the assumption that marriage is the basis for raising children. When did gay men start getting pregnant? If you allow that Deviant behavior you must allow for ALL deviant behavior.

Are you ok with a mother who has a full hysterectomy marrying her son. What about a father marrying his sterile daughter?

I don't care what they do, it wouldn't affect me. I don't see why in an individualist society, the state should enforce any moral guidelines on citizens. If nobody is being harmed, consent is given, why should the law be involved?

[Dacabeti]

Oh my....I feel so ashamed, some nutjob has insulted my school...I would LOVE to see you try and get in here. I said it was not being taught widespread in MA schools, it's being taught in A SCHOOL. Trying to characterize a persons constitutional rights to equality as the same as incest is just plain stupid. Secondly, denying someone their rights because we are afraid of giving these god-given rights frankly makes you sound like a Democrat. Finally, the idea of being happy with civil unions is frankly laughable; "seperate but equal" was decided unconstitutional long ago....everyone needs to be allowed marriage or no one can. There is no seperate but equal here, sorry.

You said it was not being forced in Mass, I proved you wrong. Keep back peddling. Like most things you start with 1 school then move it to more schools. The fact that parents can not OPT out is a serious issue. If you can not see that as indoctrination your blinded by your ideology. I would be just as offended if they tried the same thing in 1 school with anything I support. No school should have more say into how I raise my children then I do.

Please post the line in the Constitution where is says a man can marry a man and a woman can marry a woman. You made the claim now back it up.

You are a complete hypocrite. What gives you the right to force your views that incest is wrong while homosexuality is right? There are many men and women who can not have children, using your arguments they should be allowed to marry even if they are family.

I made the OSU crack as a joke. You know one college fan cracking on another. I happen to be a Mizzou fan (wrestling more so then football). By the way I went to Stanford, just a tad higher on the evolutionary college ladder then OSU.

And just for the record my stance on gay marriage is that like most things its a states rights issue, not a Federal issue.

[Dacabeti]

I don't care what they do, it wouldn't affect me. I don't see why in an individualist society, the state should enforce any moral guidelines on citizens. If nobody is being harmed, consent is given, why should the law be involved?

While I do not agree with your opinion I do respect that it is a consistent one. Too many pro gay marriage people are inconsistent when it comes to other deviant behavior.

Thank you.