My Problem With The Right

[Dacabeti]

I did, and from an educated perspective I refuted your concussions. Perhaps we agree to disagree on this topic. As it is, I find your quotes inconclusive.

-Logic

Hoggerel,
I posted quotes from the Founding fathers all stating their religious views and you refute them from an educational perspective? See now an educated man would call that being intellectually corrupt.

[BOFH]

We weren't discussing Gore. Stop polarizing the issues, it's solving nothing. Again, you can prove nothing of substance.

-Logic

Well, you're the one that mentioned Bush's college education, and insinuated that he only passed because of his daddy.

To break it down for your simple mind, you're clearly insisting that Bush is an idiot, and that he is incapable of graduating college. Therefore, he has no business running a country.

*I* merely stated that Al Gore had graduated from college as well, presumably all by himself, then he turns around and claims to have invented the internet. Which makes him an idiot.

The whole essence of my post was to show you that college education really doesn't matter on these issues, so your whole point is moot.

Now, by very definition, YOU are attempting to keep this topic polarized, and I have just destroyed that.

I thought you were done with me? After all, I'm just a tard... clearly I know nothing and have absolutely no intelligence, so why does it matter what I say??

[logic]

Hoggerel,
I posted quotes from the Founding fathers all stating their religious views and you refute them from an educational perspective? See now an educated man would call that being intellectually corrupt.

I understand Jefferson very well. I could just as easily dig up quotes where he condemns Christendom. I believe that I summerized his beliefs very accurately in my previous post. The quote that you presented doesn't show his holistic thoughts on the matter.

-Logic

[logic]

Well, you're the one that mentioned Bush's college education, and insinuated that he only passed because of his daddy.

To break it down for your simple mind, you're clearly insisting that Bush is an idiot, and that he is incapable of graduating college. Therefore, he has no business running a country.

*I* merely stated that Al Gore had graduated from college as well, presumably all by himself, then he turns around and claims to have invented the internet. Which makes him an idiot.

The whole essence of my post was to show you that college education really doesn't matter on these issues, so your whole point is moot.

Now, by very definition, YOU are attempting to keep this topic polarized, and I have just destroyed that.

I thought you were done with me? After all, I'm just a tard... clearly I know nothing and have absolutely no intelligence, so why does it matter what I say??

Yes, Bush is unfit to lead. No, he's not very bright.

Yes, Al Gore went to college. No, he has nothing to do with the issue at hand.

-Logic

[BOFH]

Yes, Bush is unfit to lead. No, he's not very bright.

Yes, Al Gore went to college. No, he has nothing to do with the issue at hand.

-Logic

Well, by your LOGIC, logic, college is an important part of it.

I'm arguing that it is NOT.

And I proved my point by using Gore as an example of a COMPLETE AND TOTAL IDIOT who happens to have graduated from one of the most prestigious universities in the WORLD.

Dude, I know you've got the personality of a pet cobra, and you're particularly unhappy with the way I've made you my whipping bitch since the day you arrived, but from the way you talk, surely you're smart enough and fair enough to engage in this DISCOURSE and look past my flaws and see the point I'm trying to make.

If I tell you that the sky is blue, regardless of whether or not you LIKE me, guess what? The sky is still blue...

[logic]

Well, by your LOGIC, logic, college is an important part of it.

I'm arguing that it is NOT.

And I proved my point by using Gore as an example of a COMPLETE AND TOTAL IDIOT who happens to have graduated from one of the most prestigious universities in the WORLD.

Dude, I know you've got the personality of a pet cobra, and you're particularly unhappy with the way I've made you my whipping bitch since the day you arrived, but from the way you talk, surely you're smart enough and fair enough to engage in this DISCOURSE and look past my flaws and see the point I'm trying to make.

If I tell you that the sky is blue, regardless of whether or not you LIKE me, guess what? The sky is still blue...

This post has no merit. It presents no new evidence. It presents no new argument and I agree with points in it.

No, you haven't made me your "whipping bitch." You're 3,000+ miles away from me and you couldn't hurl an insult to save your life.

I would rip the hell out of you, if you were worth my time. Believe me, I am much cleverer than you.

-Logic

[BOFH]

This post has no merit. It presents no new evidence. It presents no new argument and I agree with points in it.

No, you haven't made me your "whipping bitch." You're 3,000+ miles away from me and you couldn't hurl an insult to save your life.

I would rip the hell out of you, if you were worth my time. Believe me, I am much cleverer than you.

-Logic

:: grin ::

What's next, Logic? Gonna stamp your feet & scream?

By all means, rip away m'boy... rip awayyyyyyyy

[Bucks]

Oh my god, Bucks. You really haven't the slightest as to what I'm taking about, do you.

Here you go: Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Basic tenants of Classical Liberalism and all that it took was a trip to Wikipedia.

-Logic

Looks like you have no idea what I'm talking about.
.

[logic]

The day is young...

If you think we aren't slipping into the dark ages, then look around you, bub. See the ghastly things that people aren't just delving into, but loudly proclaiming as a right, when any moral sensible human being would sooner die of shame.

Obama has charisma, but he is singularly without substance. Bush and McCain (and Charlie Brown, for that matter) have him beat hollow on that count. Obama is ignorant, and insults his betters with his ignorance.

Bullshit on all counts. You posted multiple responses to him afterward, you've offered mainly lawyer doubletalk, you act like a teenage know-it-all, and you really need to look in the mirror...

He's either a lawyer or a wannabe; what do you expect?...

1. Typical lawyer talk; bombard with technical doubletalk to mask the truth...
2. Another two bits to CL for borrowing his tricorder:


1. Liar liar, pants on fire!
2. Arrogant weiner (par for the course).
3. Yup, you're sure over him.
4. If you repeat a lie often enough... yeah, right!

1. BS. The primary requisite for successful negotiation is that both parties negotiate in good faith. The Left would have us pulling a Neville Chamberlain with every Hitler on the planet.
2. Bullshit. Obama's interest was in Obama, period.
3. Like we'd wait for permission from you.

I love how you can't present an un-editorialized argument. Do you consider yourself a gifted blogger?

None of this has any merit. And what's more, you know it.

You're too smart for this.

-Logic

[logic]

Looks like you have no idea what I'm talking about.
.

If you call someone a "Classic liberal" then you had better know what the term means. All that I'm saying.

-Logic