Will our beloved RINOS as Sotomayor the important question?

[johnwk]

Well, this week begins Sonia Sotomayor’s hearing and the big question is, will any of our beloved Republicans ask Sonia one of the most important questions which can be asked:

Will you enforce the documented intentions under which our Constitution was adopted, as those intentions may be established from a preponderance of evidence take from the historical records during which time our Constitution was being framed and ratified?

I doubt if our RINO controlled Republican Party will rise to the occasion and ask Sonia Sotomayor one of the most important questions she ought to be asked which is stated above.

As to following precedent, which most assuredly will come up, the only thing which Republicans should be interested in concerning precedent is, our Constitution commands by its very words that those who take the oath of office are to support “this Constitution” and nothing is said regarding precedent! Keep in mind that precedent was used to overturn the Tenth Amendment and our various state legislature’s role in legislating on the issue of abortion!


JWK


“The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when adopted, it means now. “___ South Carolina v. United States, 199 U.S. 437 (1905)

[CWolf]

She's already freely stated she believes the Constitution is a living document.

[BananaRepublic]

Will any of the rest of the conservatives ask her to explain her racist comments? Justice is supposd to be blind, but she's definitely not.

[Zune]

but she's a latino! how can she possibly be racist?

[Bucks]

Sounds like LINDSEY GRAHAM is going to vote in favor already.

Sen. Al Franken is doing a comedy bit on the judiciary committee right now, well sounds like comedy.


.

[Zune]

Originally Posted by Bucks

Sounds like LINDSEY GRAHAM is going to vote in favor already.

Sen. Al Franken is doing a comedy bit on the judiciary committee right now, well sounds like comedy.


.

Al franken can be funny?

[Bucks]

Originally Posted by Zune

Al franken can be funny?

When he is trying to be serious.

.

[Zune]

Originally Posted by Bucks

When he is trying to be serious.

.

I think its great that we have a comedian in congress.

Now how about we elect dane cook, ron white, jeff foxworthy, and weird al yankovic into the senate and the house?

Isn't that such a great idea? :)

[Caroline]

Anti abortion protestor thrown out and hauled off to jail during the sodameyer hearings. How come it is that code oink and other leftist loudmouths don't ever get arrested for their outbursts??

Hot Air Blog Archive Video: Anti-abortion protester disrupts Sotomayor hearing

[johnwk]

So far, not even a whisper from our Republicans pointing to the most fundament rule of constitutional law:

Intent of constitution
16 Am Jur 2d Constitutional law
Par. 92. Intent of framers and adopters as controlling.

The fundamental principle of constitutional construction is that effect must be given to the intent of the framers of the organic law and of the people adopting it. This is the polestar in the construction of constitutions, all other principles of construction are only rules or guides to aid in the determination of the intention of the constitution’s framers.

(countless citations omitted).

Our alleged Republicans are exposing themselves for the traitorous RINOs they really are as the hearing progresses.


Regards,
JWK

Expounding upon our Constitution is not a matter of “interpretation” as some would have us believe…it is a task of “documentation”! Enemies of our constitutional system wish to ignore the recorded intentions for which our Constitution [each article, section, clause and amendment] was adopted in order to then be free to make the Constitution mean whatever they wish it to mean.