Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief


#1

Benghazi blunder: Obama unworthy commander-in-chief
Las Vegas Review-Journal
11/1/12

Based on documents released by the committee, on the day of the attack the Pentagon dispatched a drone with a video camera so everyone in Washington could see what was happening in real time. The drone documented no crowds protesting any video. But around 4 p.m. Washington received an email from the Benghazi mission saying it was under a military-style attack. The White House, the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA were able to watch the live video feed. An email sent later that day reported “Ansar al-Sharia claims responsibility for Benghazi attack.”

Not only did the White House do nothing, there are now reports that a counterterrorism team ready to launch a rescue mission was ordered to stand down.

The official explanation for the inadequate security? This administration didn’t want to “offend the sensibilities” of the new radical Islamic regime which American and British arms had so recently helped install in Libya.

The official explanation for why Obama administration officials watched the attack unfold for seven hours, refusing repeated requests to send the air support and relief forces that sat less than two hours away in Italy? Silence.

When Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney promptly criticized the security failures in Benghazi, the White House and its lapdog media jumped all over him for another “gaffe,” for speaking out too promptly and too strongly. Prompt and strong action from the White House on Sept. 11 might have saved American lives, as well as America’s reputation as a nation not to be messed with. Weakness and dithering and flying to Las Vegas the next day for celebrity fund-raising parties are somehow better?

This administration is an embarrassment on foreign policy and incompetent at best on the economy - though a more careful analysis shows what can only be a perverse and willful attempt to destroy our prosperity. …

Just, plain, WOW! The sad thing about this is that 1.) it should have been published 3 or 4 weeks ago, 2.) by every daily in the country! The sad thing is, no matter what the outcome of next week’s election is, not matter what is learned about how the Benghazi attack was handled, the editors of the LVRJ are marked men and women. Whether 30-something or 60-something, they are at the zenith of their journalism careers. They will find doors slammed in their faces at major national media outlets, because they dared to publish the truth about Barack Obama’s failed “Presidency”.


#2

I am at a TOTAL LOSS as to why Obammy has not been read his rights pending charges being filed. Were he not the FIRST BLACK POTUS he would go to jail