Chris Christie invokes the amnesty crowd’s talking point “secure the border first”.


#1

This evening while on Foxnews, “Greta on the Record”, Chris Christie was repeatedly asked, once the border is secure what does he proposes to do with the millions of illegal entrants who are here. But instead of laying out a point by point plan dealing with the tens of millions of illegal aliens who are here and by their very presence are causing devastating social, financial and political consequences, Chris Christie decided to use the amnesty crowd’s talking point and said, he will not discuss that issue until the border is secure. Of course, about 45 percent of illegals who are here have come in legally and overstayed their visas which has nothing to do with securing the border.

Christie’s refusal to lay out a plan dealing with the tens of millions of illegal entrants who are here is convincing evidence he intends, at the very least, to find a way to legalize them and give them work permits so they can remain in our country which is exactly what Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, and John Kasich intend to do, regardless of the devastating effects suffered by American citizens from the presence of illegal entrants and their children.

It is quite obvious that any thinking person concerned with the General Welfare of the United States and her citizens, would, at the very least, offer a point by point plan making it uncomfortable for illegal entrants to remain in the country and would encourage them to leave on their own. For example, a modest plan dealing with aliens who are in our country illegally could include:

Requiring business owners to utilize e-verify when hiring;

Stepping up the prosecution of business owners who hire illegal entrants;

Deny illegal entrants any tax payer financed medical care (excepting in a life death situation);

Deny the children of illegal aliens access to a State’s public school system and all public assistance programs, i.e., any privileges created by a state for its citizens;

Direct the appropriate federal government agencies to identify aliens who have overstayed their visa and prioritized their expulsion from our country whenever their name comes up when applying for a driver’s license, stopped for a traffic infraction or other crime, etc.

Forbid and make it a crime for illegals to live in any public housing unit or section eight housing;

Evict section eight occupants and public housing occupants if caught harboring illegal aliens;

And making it a point to never allow a person who has entered our country illegally, or is here illegally and caught, to re-enter our country legally in the future __ giving existing illegals a two month period to leave on their own before implementing this rule.

But our beloved tough talking Governor from New Jersey, which is the armpit of New York City which has a love affair with illegal entrants, refuses to have an adult conversation about one of the most pressing issues of our times ___ how do we get rid of the tens of millions of aliens who are here illegally and by their very presence are causing social, financial and political consequences which are suffered by American citizens.

JWK


To support Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, or John Kasich is to support a continuance of Obama’s illegal immigration tyranny which includes giving legal status and work permits to tens of millions who have invaded our borders!



#2

No good can come from allowing 10s of millions of poverty stricken, poorly education and low skilled foreigners to flood into our country. We are already witnessing the devastating social, economic and political consequences from this uncontrolled immigration and yet, neither Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, or John Kasich is willing to talk about the devastating effects suffered by American citizens from uncontrolled immigration, and what to do about them. WHY?

JWK

*** The surest way for Obama to accomplish his fundamental transformation of America is to flood America with the poverty stricken and destitute populations of other countries.***


#3

.
See Video: Black protesters confront pro-Illegal immigrant supporters with raw passion

July 8, 2014

***”A small group of black Americans at the Murrieta California Border Patrol Station on July 4th debated illegal immigration with a passion that went beyond individual opinion, reaching into the effects the surge would have on American society as a whole.

At times, the discussion focused on the predicted impact the problem will have on the black community, already facing a significantly higher unemployment rate than the rest of society. Immigration is not a black or white issue, but the arguments here are powerful and based on deeply rooted experiences.”***

Neither Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, or John Kasich want to have the conversation about how illegal immigration is affecting Black and Puerto Rican American citizens who are being squeezed out of the job market by illegals.

JWK


To support Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, or John Kasich is to support a continuance of Obama’s illegal immigration tyranny which includes giving legal status and work permits to tens of millions who have invaded our borders, and panders to the Chamber of Commerce, the Club for Growth and our Global Governance Crowd



#4

If t’s weasely, politician shenanigans and it comes from Chris Christie, it’s not surprising in the least.


#5

I notice how the RINOs in a bid to seem relevant now say close the border. They really do not mean it but consider voters stupid.


#6

They pulled that same crap when Reagan was president. And once amnesty was granted they celebrated in Georgetown and invited in more illegal entrants by refusing to secure the border!

JWK


#7

Most are acting as private contractors, it is a Leftist myth that most are getting regular jobs.

Most of those “Business Owners” are illegals themselves.

That would not save much since most only use health care services in “emergency’s” and medical care providers are bound by law to never refuse treatment based on a persons inability to pay.

If these children are citizens (and most are) they cannot be denied these things based on their parents criminal behavior.

The feds have no Right to access any States data regarding licensing or other infractions that the Constitution says are appropriate for the States to regulate themselves.

Most public housing is established at the State level.

The feds cannot evict people from private or State established housing, they can arrest those who commit federal crimes but they have NO say in how Private or State owned properties are managed.

That would be an appropriate action at the Federal level.

The feds can throw out those who commit serious crimes as they get arrested but the only plausible solution for the rest is to remove the legal barriers that give illegal contractors a supreme advantage over legal citizens in our productive sector and making the border very difficult to cross anonymously. Building up a more extensive federal police force will never correct the problem that we have created by building a more extensive government that crushes it’s own citizens under regulations that criminals can ignore with impunity.


#8

Seems like a quick solution to get us back on track is to abandon the Citizenship by Birth status when the parents aren’t citizens themselves.


#9

Your uninformed and misleading opinions are noted.

JWK


#10

Exactly! Enforce our Constitution!

Birth right citizenship as applied to the children of an illegal alien is a myth!

The anchor baby myth was invented by Justice William Brennan in 1982

***see: "The anchor baby scam was invented 30… - Anti Liberal Zone

“The anchor baby scam was invented 30 years ago by a liberal zealot, Justice William Brennan, who slipped a footnote into a 1982 Supreme Court opinion announcing that the kids born to illegals on U.S. soil are citizens. Fox News is treating Brennan’s crayon scratchings on the Constitution as part of our precious national heritage.”***

If there is a sincere desire to establish the meaning of the 14th Amendment rather than create our own meaning, should we not turn to those who actually wrote the amendment and debated it to discover its meaning as it was understood when the 14th amendment was framed and adopted? If your answer is “yes”, then we must determine what the qualifying words “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means as understood by those who framed and helped to ratify the 14th Amendment.

JWK

***The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it.***_____HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASS’N v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)


#11

Riiiiiight, like you ever take notes!