You are just pretending that you are an expert. But you don’t have a deeper understanding.
Your argumentation strategy is to bring in irrelevant data that have nothing to do with the actual issue (and which are partially wrong). Examples:
a This has nothing to do with CO2’s warming effect.
b That fact that volcanoes emit CO2 does not refute that humans are involved too.
b You yourself said: Amount of vapor is constant. So it does not influence temperature changes. But CO2 does because its amount is changing.
d Do know that every plant is emitting the same amount of CO2 when it rots and decomposes then it took up form the atmosphere in its whole lifetime? Plants do NOT have a CO2 reducing NET effect.
Another problem is that you accept science if it supports your positions but you reject it, if it supports opposite standpoints:
So we should rely on your word?
Then you are making a lot of logical errors:
This proves that you really have no idea what you are actually taking about.
The amount of Oxygen is always the same: It can occur in pure form OXYGEN or as part of CO2 (the O2 in CO2 means OXYGEN). So if there is more CO2 there can’t be more OXYGEN at the same time. Oh my God…
Remember the logic error regarding the CO2 ratio, we discussed recently.
And in general you are not fully aware of your own positions:
You claim CO2, argon and vapor are greenhouse gases. O.K. good. But at the same time you say that global warming is NOT caused by men although we know that men emit CO2.