That’s my question to you; here we have the ******* DA saying it’s a sanctuary law, that it disrupts their relationship with the Feds, and still you deny it.
Yet you can’t deny it RET, you made a mistake.
Here’s what you did RET: You read the first description of the law you found, one which didn’t convey everything, and you’ve pretended with me that that’s all the law was.
You pretended to know more about their situation than you did, and you pretended the only ones calling this a sanctuary law were leftist.
In doing this you’ve only compounded your original error.
You should have been honest at the start, and admitted what’s clearly obvious; it’s a sanctuary law.
I was expecting you to downplay it for being Oregon, just one small state, who did it in 1987, not this nonsense you’re feeding me where you call Conservatives liars, and deny what words mean.