Coulter savages Trump


Brutal stuff here. I can actually respectfully disagree with Coulter. She’s basically saying “I knew Trump was an evil and disgusting human being, but I thought maybe that’s what it was going to take to get policy done.” Her premise was pretty crazy, but at least she’s not stupid.

The basic factory setting on the perception of Trump is: gigantic douchebag. This is a man who manufactured fake Time magazine covers featuring himself with the headline, “Donald Trump: The ‘Apprentice’ is a television smash!” so that he could put framed copies of it on the walls of his clubs.

His business is convincing people with lowbrow taste to give him their money.

He’s a vulgar publicity hound who used to call reporters in a fake voice and pretend to be his own PR agent, “John Miller” or “John Barron,” so he could brag that actresses wanted to date him.

It’s not as if a majority of his voters weren’t clear-eyed about what kind of man he is. If anything, Trump’s vulgar narcissism made his vow to build a wall more believable. Respectable politicians had made similar promises over the years – and they always betrayed the voters. Maybe it took a sociopath to ignore elite opinion and keep his word.


From the article:

What else were we going to do? He was the only one talking sense. Unfortunately, that’s all he does: talk. He’s not interested in doing anything that would require the tiniest bit of effort.

She’s got to know that’s the silliest thing she’s ever written. President Trump may be the busiest, doing-est president we’ve ever had. I’m guessing she just wrote it to apply pressure to get him to stand firm and veto any bill without wall funding.

Well, maybe it worked because President Trump just said,

What they are just beginning to realize is that I will not sign any of their legislation, including infrastructure, unless it has perfect Border Security. U.S.A. WINS!

God bless President Trump! May the Lord give him the will to stand firm against the contemptuous, open-border Democrats.


The Lord generally doesn’t bless sociopathic liars with no respect for the law and who cheat on their pregnant wives with porn stars.


That is one of the most disgusting, dishonest comments I have read on these boards. Just because you are a socialist and don’t agree with him is no reason to write such things.


Hosea 1:2

When the Lord first spoke through Hosea, the Lord said to Hosea, “Go, take to yourself a wife of whoredom and have children of whoredom, for the land commits great whoredom by forsaking the Lord.”


I wish I could “like” this response twice…


Am I supposed to take this verse and passage as a counter to J’s comment that the Lord doesn’t bless sociopathic liars with no respect and who cheat on their pregnant wives with porn stars? I’m presuming so since you are in defense of the president in this thread, but I’m failing to see the connection.

This passage doesn’t show blessings for a sociopathic lying cheater, but it does talk about God rejecting the nation of Israel. Would you elaborate please.,


Sociopath? I just read a little about sociopaths online and now I’m not sure I could distinguish a sociopath from any successful politician. But President Trump is doing what he campaigned on. He’s doing what we elected him to do. The word “sociopath” has an extremely negative connotation, but President Trump is extremely good, so it’s the wrong word to use.

The verse was intended to show that the Lord God doesn’t follow man’s script on how the Lord should work or man’s thinking on what kind of person the Lord should work through.

It may be ironic that the Lord God instructed Hosea to marry a prostitute so he could use her as a metaphor to communicate Israel’s prostitution. But he did. And no matter what bad qualities the left assigns to President Trump, the Lord God can and is using him to bless America and maybe even the world. That’s why I invoked the Lord’s blessing on him.


The conservative movement has been totally morally compromised by the Trump movement. It’s shocking how quickly and easily it happened. A movement traditionally dedicated to notions of duty and honor now cheers on a vulgar draft-dodging playboy while he wraps himself in the flag and insults the service of war heroes.


Calling John McCain a “war hero” is an insult to war heroes.


The life and career of John McCain was a mixed bag and hardly a roll model. While he did persevere in Hanoi and serve with honor, when he came home, he became an unreliable maverick who seemed to have few principles except that he liked to stir the pot. In the end he dishonored himself when he sided with those who took his misguided support for their programs and give him nothing in return. In short they played him for a fool.

I voted for and give his campaign money in 2008. I don’t regret the vote, but I do regret the financial contribution.


McCain grew up as a pampered, privileged fool. He lived most of his life in the exact same way. One would have thought, being the son and grandson of a Navy admiral, he’d have been subjected to a degree of discipline. He wasn’t. If he had ANY self-discipline at all, it was in order to preserve his plans for his future. He didn’t refuse repatriation after capture out of some sense of “solidarity” with other POWs. He refused because he KNEW his father would condemn him for accepting and in order to preserve his political viability after discharge from the Navy. Had he accepted, his father would have virtually disowned him and any hopes of elective office would have vanished like fog on a hot day.