Democrat Leadership wants to pack the S.C. if they take control of the House


#1

It is no longer a secret that socialist political leaders have a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court if they seize political power, and they will then appoint socialist Justices who will impose “social justice” as the rule of law rather than support and adhere to our written Constitution and its documented legislative intent which gives context to its text.

See: These Leftists Want Democrats To Pack The Supreme Court Once Trump Is Gone

”Leftists upset that President Donald Trump will get to shape the Supreme Court in a conservative direction are increasingly embracing a radical plan to expand the number of seats on the court once Democrats retake Congress and the White House.”

Make no mistake, this desire __ making our Supreme Court into a Legislative body unaccountable to the people ___ began back in the early 1930s when Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a socialist democrat, attempted to pack the court under “The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937”. See Roosevelt announces “court-packing”plan

"On February 5, 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt announces a controversial plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges, allegedly to make it more efficient. Critics immediately charged that Roosevelt was trying to “pack” the court and thus neutralize Supreme Court justices hostile to his New Deal.

During the previous two years, the high court had struck down several key pieces of New Deal legislation on the grounds that the laws delegated an unconstitutional amount of authority to the executive branch and the federal government."

And this is what the Democrat Party Leadership is about ___ subjugating our constitutionally limited system of government and creating an iron fisted socialist democracy where the mob rules, and fundamental rights and guarantees are ignored, including rights associated with property ownership.

Of course, this plan requires an overwhelming number of Justices on the Supreme Court who will ignore the true meaning of our Constitution, and give an illusion that social justice legislation adopted by a socialist political leadership in Congress, is within the meaning of our Constitution, and does not defy the text or legislative intent of our Constitution. Keep in mind this is exactly what happened when FDR’s Social Security Act was wrongly upheld by the court in 1935 which lied about the constitutional meaning of “general welfare” as the phrase appears in our Constitution.

The bottom line is, if social democrat leaders take control of the House and Senate this November, they will be well on their way to getting rid of President Trump, increasing the number of Justices on the Supreme Court, and then appointing a majority of Justices who will uphold social justice legislation, such as free Medicaid for all, designed to alter our system of government into an iron fisted socialist/communist state, just as is Cuba or Venezuela.

JWK

The unavoidable truth is, Andrew Gillum and the Democrat Leadership’s socialist plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs


#2

So they boost the seats to 12 or 13 and Trump picks 3 or 4 more Originalists, plus 1 when Ginsburg goes.

Seems pointless from the Leftist perspective, maybe if they had the White House like with FDR but doing it now would be ridiculous from their perspective.


#3

And, that is the point. If they [the Democrat Party Leadership] is allowed to take control of Congress this coming election, and then retake the presidency in 2020, they will be able to create a socialist majority on the Supreme Court and nullify what President Trump has done.

Republicans have lost many elections which could have been won simply because they did not show up at the polls.

JWK

American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance the economic needs of millions of poverty stricken, poorly educated, low and unskilled aliens who have invaded America’s borders.


#4

The news media is telling us that “the blue wave is coming” because 80% of the Democrats are planning to vote while only 63% of the Republicans are going to show up at the polls. They say that suburban America, led by women voters who are going to show at the polls in droves.

Are the women really that stupid? Are 60% of them really wearing vagina hats looking to the government to be their providers? Have they failed to note the mobs in Washington? The press tells us that women want peace and tranquility. Have the Democrats provided us with any peace and tranquility? Not from what I have seen.


#5

There will be no “Blue Wave”, the GOP will increase its majorities in both houses of Congress and make nationwide gains in State and Local elections as well.

I rarely make declarative predictions this far out but there is simply no way for the Democrats to turn it around this late.

If you look at the metrics being applied to the polling data they are adding 8 to 10 percent to the Democrats based on some ridiculous assumptions; the Left will be crushed in this election.

At least the Left who run as Democrats will lose, the Leftist Republicans will continue to muck up the process going forward.


#6

What I’m hearing from a conservative pundit (Dr. Steve Colman, on the Washington Watch feature on Family Life Network’s (regional Christian radio network) noon news) is that the Ds will take the House, but the Rs will hold the Senate.

Having said that, given Hillary’s predicted victory in 2016, skewed polls, and the fact that the Ds may have overplayed their hand in their failed attempt to Bork Brett Kavanaugh, I don’t rule out the possibility that the Rs will hold on to both.


#7

Concur.


#8

One factor in the voter turnout and polling data might that many of us are hanging up the phone when we get polling calls. I live in Florida, and the pollsters are calling all the time. I have only answered one, and my wife has answered none of them. If other conservatives are doing that, the polls are under Republican the conservative vote.


#9

When FDR tried to pack the Supreme Court, his own party would not support him. He thought he had the whole thing set. He was going to put Senate Majority Leader, Joe Robinson on the court. In those days if a senator was picked for the court, his colleagues were sure to support him. Robinson died of a heart attack just before his appointment was made. That took some of the wind out of the Roosevelt initiative. Despite the huge Democrat majority that FDR had, a good number of those senators were southern Democrats who were conservatives. Unfortunately all of the conservatives have been driven from the modern Democrat Party.

Here is a U.S. commemorative coin, approved by Congress, that was issued at the time that Joe Robinson was still alive and Senate Majority Leader. Talk about chutzpah!