Democrats warn next leaks could contain Russian fabrications


#1

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is among those sounding that alarm, echoing security experts who say Russian security services have been known to doctor documents and images or bury fictitious, damaging details amid genuine** information. For hackers to resort to such tactics would be highly unusual, but security specialists say it’s a realistic extension of Moscow’s robust information warfare efforts.

Democrats warn next leaks could contain Russian fabrications « Hot Air

Translation being democrats we are sacks of puss who do not want people to know what we are really doing so we allude the russians are changing the words. wink wink**


#2

**Democrats warn next leaks could contain Russian fabrications **
.
There wouldn’t be a democratic party if the Republicans were as on the ball as the dems leadership. My God I admire them. They are already laying the groundwork to protect themselves even before something hits the fan. Yes, I admire them because they are amazing. I assume that if or when Hill’s emails start hitting the web they will just widen the statement. Wow!


#3

I, for one, Do Not have any respect or admiration for these lying, conniving, traitorous, leftists, scum!

Why should I?

IF this country had a real media with real journalists, nothing that these people(?) say or do would Ever pass the ‘smell test’ and would be laughed at with full front page and Breaking News coverage!

So … who do you really admire?

The bolsheviks* or those in the media who do all the work in covering for them??*


#4

The Russians and Hillary are on equal footing when it comes to honesty. Neither of them are credible without collaboration.


#5

I, for one, Do Not have any respect or admiration for these lying, conniving, traitorous, leftists, scum!
.
Silliessis I do get it. It’s just that I stand back in awe of the ability of the left to constantly “sell” their agenda of lies while the right can’t seem to get people to even listen, much less believe stuff that is common sense. Think about it for a minute. The left has a war going against the 1% while at the same time BEING the 1% & people are flocking to their banner. That’s talent. They are constantly on the attack even while being the one’s caught with their hands in the cookie jar. The question that comes to my mind is are they that good or are people that stupid? In the end it really doesn’t matter, it all comes down to the votes.


#6

Er, did you mean “corroboration?”

In Hillary’s case, it would cause me to scrutinize the corroborators…


#7

Preemptive strike against leaks’ and leakers’ credibility? Did Miss Nancy just admit all previous leaked materials were genuine?

Some D leaders must’ve doubled their monthly order of Depends for between now and the end of November.


#8

**Preemptive strike against leaks’ and leakers’ credibility? Did Miss Nancy just admit all previous leaked materials were genuine?
Some D leaders must’ve doubled their monthly order of Depends for between now and the end of November. **
.
I doubt it. Politics doesn’t deal in reality. An agenda that has clearly failed, isn’t a failure until the people understand that it’s a failure. A lie isn’t a lie until the people both understand that it’s a lie & agree that lying is bad. Right now I’m not sure how “the people” feel. My gut feeling is that the left has done one hell of a job making fun of Trump, pointing out every flaw & even making stuff up but what good is it doing? I don’t know. I know that there’s a movement against Trump from the right probably built on the fact that he isn’t owned by the right. There’s a lot of stuff thrown into the mixture of this election but there really isn’t a way to tell how it will turn out until the end. Really though everything the left is doing has worked for them in the past so I doubt that they are in panic mode. Remember liberalism is a religion & true believers will never doubt their God.


#9

What is interesting about this position, is that it welcomes, no, SCREAMS of some serious allegations or revelations that could have a major impact on some careers. Under what premise would someone state this unless they were anticipating or worried about some unflattering emails being released? My guess is her making this statement has the public more interested in knowing what isn’t being shared transparently.

She cannot in any way shape or form know what has been hacked, nor what this information might entail across her entire party. She would know what SHE has sent and communications she may have had. Possibly a reason for her to try and get ahead of this?