To be honest, I am a little fed up with the Trumpsters on this site pointing the finger of blame away from themselves to explain what is probably going to be a monumental fail by the nominee of their choice, Donald Trump.
For the Trumpsters, people with which I share most policy positions but for whom I have little patience or sympathy, I have a question.
But first, I have an observation - it is this: If I were to have asked people on this site for a show of hands regarding which Party, Republican or Democrat, they thought had the most compelling, demonstrably factual election message I am quite certain there would have been unanimity, or very close to it, in favor of the policy positions/issues espoused by the Right.
So, now the question I have for those who supported Trump’s nomination - the aforementioned Trumpsters: If the Right had the issues/policy positions and a compelling set of facts on the ground in support of those issues/policy positions (which it did), why in the hell did you insist on nominating a man who from the outset was so obviously flawed that it was apparent he couldn’t and/or wouldn’t stay on message?? A “rigged election”? Yes, and you helped rig it.
If Trump loses, at it appears he will, I suggest you Trumpsters take a good, long look in the mirror - one of the people most responsible for the Hillary Clinton victory will be looking back at you.