Have long suspected his self defense actions would be recognized, it is OBVIOUS to anyone rational that he tried to run a away from the mob before he was forced to shoot, when they were attacking him from behind.
September 6, 2020
Kenosha Prosecutor Proves Kyle Rittenhouse’s Case
I downloaded and read the charges filed against Kyle Rittenhouse by Kenosha assistant district attorney Angelina Gabriele. If I were on the jury and read only the D.A.'s side of the story, I would acquit Rittenhouse for the most serious charges without even listening to his side. The only one that looks to me as if it could have merit is “possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18,” which is a misdemeanor.
Let’s start with Rittenhouse’s first assailant, Joseph D. Rosenbaum. If this is Joseph Don Rosenbaum from Arizona, he served prison time, which is usually consistent with a felony conviction. I was unable to confirm from AZ or WI records that he was a sexual offender, as some have claimed. The following is not Rittenhouse’s side of the story as told by himself or his attorney; it is the prosecutor’s side of the story. The “probable cause” portion of the document says (I am copying from an OCR transcription of the original PDF document so the accuracy might not be 100%, and emphasis is mine):
Following the defendant is Rosenbaum … The video shows that as they cross the parking lot, Rosenbaum appears to throw an object at the defendant . The object does not hit the defendant and a second video shows, based on where the object landed, that it was a plastic bag.
The prosecutor has therefore stipulated that Rosenbaum followed Rittenhouse, and the video shows that he pursued Rittenhouse. The video also shows that the unknown object went considerably farther than an empty plastic bag would have gone, which suggests that it was some kind of weapon.
When Kyle is declared innocent due to valid self defense reasons, leftists will riot because they are haters of self defense decision.