Here is the email I sent to Tamara Holder:
I watched your debate with Lila Rose on Hannity’s show. I can’t believe how incredibly ignorant someone can possible be.
You chastised Ms. Rose about having edited video and “shoddy reporting,” while it is clear the editing is due to constraints of time on a news show. She has full videos on her website, which Hannity pointed out. You made this into a personal attack on Ms. Rose, while she continued to be more than cordial to you.
What’s even more troubling is you willingness for a baby born alive to be left to die or to be killed. Your problem with performing life sustaining measures on a baby was the law states 24 weeks and the scenario was a 23 ½ week pregnancy. So, because the law states 24 weeks, you would be willing to allow a breathing baby outside the womb to be killed based upon the decision of the law and a mere two weeks. You were so adamant about what the law states that a two week time frame is acceptable in your mind to kill another person. The Nuremberg laws in 1935 Germany defined what was classified a German and what was classified a Jew. People who did not practice the Jewish religion were defined as Jews for having Jewish grandparents, so since the law was able to define who was Jewish and who wasn’t, the Nazi government was able to dehumanize Jews, infringe on their rights, imprison them, and often murder them. Just as you kept uttering, “But the law says…,” I am sure Nazi sympathizers in 1935 Germany said, “But the law says…”
Our rights, to include the right to life, are fundamental and inherent. They do not come from man, the government, or a piece of paper. Who are officials of the law to decide what is and what is not life? The bottom line is at 24 weeks or at 23 ½ weeks, if a baby is alive, outside the womb, and this baby is ignored to die, killed, or put in a jar of pesticide to drown, any thinking person with a moral conscience, whether pro-abortion or pro-life, has to know this is murder.