Mainstream conservative, or wingnut?

You have no idea what I found. I have not posted what I found yet. Who the hell do you think you are anyway.

Yes, but people don’t know that. They immediately think it’s satanic.

What are you, the second coming of Trump Train?

What I said stands, either show evidence of some source google has supressed, or we know it’s not real.

1 Like

You cannot Google it because if there is any truth to it Google will have un-indexed the pages by now. Google results are the results Google wants you to see. Google throttles and blocks the results they don’t want you to see.

One more time for the slow to learn:

Google results are the results Google wants you to see. Google throttles and blocks the results they don’t want you to see. You you understand now ? I know that truth and facts are not your thing, but here we go one more time:

Google results are the results Google wants you to see. Google throttles and blocks the results they don’t want you to see.

Therefore, when I said “You cannot Google it”, the entire sentence which the socialist chopped off was “You cannot Google it because if there is any truth to it Google will have un-indexed the pages by now.

I was 100% correct. You cannot Google it because you cannot truest Google searches, because:

Ladies and Gentlemen: What you saw here was the pinnacle of dishonest lying: Editing my sentence in order to put words in my mouth. Alaska edited my sentence, and like a CNN fake news loser who does not check his facts, csbrown just copied and pasted like any good propagandist would.

Do you all see how Alaska keeps chopping off my sentence like a propagandist? He keeps quoting me saying “ You cannot Google it

The original sentence was: “ You cannot Google it because if there is any truth to it Google will have un-indexed the pages by now

The fact is: You cannot Google it because if there is any truth to it Google will have un-indexed the pages by now. Google results are the results Google wants you to see. Google throttles and blocks the results they don’t want you to see

I repeat for a third time:

You cannot Google it because if there is any truth to it Google will have un-indexed the pages by now. Google results are the results Google wants you to see. Google throttles and blocks the results they don’t want you to see.

image

You’re darn right I am always right, just as you always twist and pervert information in order to post lies.

That’s hilarious. :rofl:

But, on another note, google DOES censor content. I don’t feel like taking the time to prove this but I already have in the past.

Take the search engine duckduckgo.com and the search results will be completely different than google.com

For instance, try using google to research anything negative about Joe Biden. The results will be so scarce that the lay person will be inclined to believe that their really isn’t anything negative to say about this man. Use duckduckgo and it’s a different story. Is this purely by chance? No, it’s because google has an agenda. Just like everyone else.

Yeah… this posting style is giving me deja vu.

The accusation anyone who disagrees is a socialist, thinking reposting the same words over and over is an argument…

Trumpgurl I think is a sockpuppet account from someone whose been here before.

Sure, but that’s not what I’m asking for.

Google de-indexing is not a blanket excuse for why you don’t find evidence for this, because the turn around is “ok, then what did you find using duck duck go?”

If the answer is still nothing, then it just looks like somebody was trying to stir the pot instead of making a real argument or alert to an actual problem.

Once again, whoever named this luciferase did a lot of pot stirring whether intentionally or not.

Literally the 19th century when religious analogies were far more common, and it predates anyone wearing tin hats, or MIC/cold war era conspiracies. The charge is no less anachronistic than saying the word “niggardly” was made to screw with people sensitive about the n word.

So I guess it was unintentionally and I have nothing more to say about this. Unless we want to start debating whether or not the word niggardly needs to be taken out of circulation, which I don’t believe it needs to be.

And yet, all you’d need to do to prove this this little theory of yours is Google it and take screen shots of the result. You know why you didn’t?

  1. Your wrong.

  2. You lack basic skills on a computer

Which is it?

She can’t answer, she got the ban hammer.

First, if you block cookies and you don’t log into Google services, in theory, you can’t be tracked so Google can’t track you.

As far as the question of whether Google “censors” your content. No. Does it taylor your content somewhat? Yes.

Does Google personalize search results?

Not really. Google personalizes search results to a very limited degree and only does it in certain instances, like with location-based searches. Personalized search results used to be more prevalent in the past, but now, search results focus more on fitting user search intent.

It would be easy to test. We could search for some stuff and screenshot the results.

Probably because they figured out that TrumpTrain and TrumpGurl are either posting from the same PC, dam cookies!, or the same IP address.

… uh, it does, for instance, child pornography.

Search engines also produce different maps depending on where you live, which I doubt many choose as a setting. Unless you have a VPN.

Yeah, and the article I believe acknowledges that. But all Guts would have to do is agree to search for a phrase like I did “Luciferase testing covid” and see if it censors the content. I mean I posted a screenshot, not only of the result, but the search term.

That said, Google does personalize your results based on things like location and history just as the article says.

QUESTION: is Biden the best president ever?

search result google

search result duckduckgo

1 Like

Now let’s try this with a more divisive question like; why does biden suck so bad?

google:

duckduckgo

1 Like

These are just the top results. And it illustrates my point. I don’t understand why bringing childporn into the discussion is necessary, but whatever. Google is biased. It’s a pretty easy to experiment to conduct, but if you’re happy about this, which I’m sure liberals are, then don’t worry about it.

In fairness, why don’t we start with the search I suggested?

Next, when you take screen shots, make sure to capture your original search terms so we both know we’re Googling the same thing. It also assures that we’re seeing the results in order.