Majority of Paris attackers entered Europe posing as refugees


#1

Seven of the nine ISIS jihadis who launched a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris last November entered Europe by posing as refugees.
The attackers were part of a group of 14 who plotted their way into Western Europe by riding the wave of the migrant crisis last year, according to Hungarian security officials.
By using fake Syrian passports, many of the attackers, already on European terror watch-lists, were able to slip back into Europe undetected, along with thousands of other refugees.

Majority of Paris attackers entered Europe posing as refugees • The Foreign Desk

obama is rushing as many of these refugees into the U.S. before he leaves office.


#2

Seven of the nine ISIS jihadis who launched a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris last November entered Europe by posing as refugees.
.
And if I were in charge of ISIS I would have planned for at least a 2nd & 3rd attack with more hidden people among the refugees. I’m betting that we can assume the same thing will happen here. My guess is that they won’t do anything until after the election because they want the same leadership in charge making the same type mistakes.


#3

Except with Obama, it’s not a “mistake.” For him it’s a policy. He wants the Muslims in here, and hopes that they will eventually take charge of the country. After that leaders like him would be in permanent control.

When you think about it, there is really not much difference between Muslim leadership and socialist or communist leadership. They both believe in the top down dictatorship model that has a few people running every aspect of the country. The advantage to Muslim leadership is that they have the power of religion that further brings people into line. Those who disagree are labeled as heretics and are easily imprisoned or executed.


#4

Obama’s dealings with ISIS have been “NI-Eve”. I know, your saying to yourself that guy can’t spell. Well I’m not a great speller but in this case I don’t think the old word or spelling covers it. So I made up ni-eve. My definition would be “To foolishly believe something & keep believing it long after facts, events, & common sense would have proved to everyone else that you were wrong”. And I hope that I’m right about Obama. That’s because the only other reason that I can think of for him to continue on this path he has chosen is that he doesn’t want to admit that he’s wrong to the extent that he’s willing to let people die rather than admit it.
.
Hardhearted I know but I really don’t care that much how many people get blown up by ISIS in other countries. So if Obama wants to spout off his stupid ideas about ISIS to them I really don’t care. After all they are responsible for their safety & if they follow his lead, well someone that stupid will kill themselves sooner or later anyway. But Obama’s job is to protect U.S. citizens & he’s doing the opposite by putting people in danger. I strongly object to the way he has made this mess a much bigger mess.


#5

I have a different take, Old Tex. Obama is very happy with the refugee problem because that pushes tens of thousands of Moslems into western Europe so that they can form a huge voting bloc that will ultimately take over those countries and destroy western culture. He wants the same thing for The United States.

So far as ISIS goes, Obama only objects to their methods, not their goals.

I know all of this sounds really “out there,” but I’ve watched this guy for seven years, and all he does push the Moslem agenda every chances he gets. Yes, he had bin Laden killed, but beyond that he’s done nothing but support the Moslem cause. He’s covered up for them after every terrorist attack from Fort Hood to the shootings in the gay night club. He’s shunned Israel and Egypt because they overthrew his favorite Moslem organization, the Moslem Brotherhood.

And if you think about it killing bin Laden fit in with the rest of his plans. Bin Laden was a Moslem lightning rod and a radical outlier. Killing bin Laden gave Obama and the Democrats political legitimacy and also made the Moslem movement more faceless. It made it easier for Obama to gloss over Moslem terrorism.

Obama could go down as the worst American president in history, but it might not be written that way if he succeeds in destroying western culture because one his minions will be writing the history.