>“of geoscientists and engineers”
Why the heck are they asking engineers?
Another group of scientists fit the “Fatalists” model. These scientists, comprising 17 percent of the respondents, “diagnose climate change as both human- and naturally caused.
The next largest group of scientists, comprising 10 percent of respondents, fit the “Economic Responsibility” model. These scientists “diagnose climate change as being natural or human caused.
Taken together, these four skeptical groups numerically blow away the 36 percent of scientists who believe global warming is human caused and a serious concern.
Note that they also combine people who believe both nature and humans cause global warming with their “majority” that reject human-only climate change, so in short the title of the article is sensationalist, and I have doubts that you actually read it if you missed this stuff. Did you just see the title and rush to post it?
He also fails to mention that the survey was conducted from the Alberta APEGA, which is associated with the petroleum industry, so this is like interviewing tobacco companies on the dangers of smoking. Why not interview scientists from a range of institutions? Obviously because there’s an agenda.