Migrant Caravan


“No borders, no walls, sanctuary for all!” “No ban. No wall. No borders at all.” Those are slogans of the Democratic Socialists of America. You can watch videos on the organization’s website and Facebook pages in which the DSA agitators are chanting the slogans as they invade a Washington, D.C.-area restaurant to harass Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen while she is eating dinner, or as they invade and block federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices. The Democratic Socialists of America, which for decades had been merely a festering carbuncle on the extreme left of the Democratic Party, now has spread its infection throughout the entire party structure.

Following the election of Donald Trump in 2016, the DSA has enjoyed spectacular growth, recruiting legions of outraged Berniecrats from the failed Bernie San­ders campaign, as well as hordes of “Resistance” militants from the Hillary camp. The DSA, reportedly, has mushroomed from 7,000 members and 15 local chapters in 2000 to 44,000 members and hundreds of chapters in 2018. It has seized the open borders/no borders cause, which until very recently was only seriously proposed by such elements of the extreme Left as the Communist Party USA, the Revolutionary Communist Party, and La Raza (The Race), the ultra-radical Mexican irredentist group that seeks to reclaim the American southwest as “Aztlan” or “Mexifornia.”


^ Trump’s RAISE Act proposed cutting the # of green cards in half, thus limiting legal immigration.

I’m waiting pal.


GOOD!! I say stop immigration altogether. And by the way, please keep your Leftist immigration argument crap out of my Catholic thread.

In the 1920s, restrictions on immigration increased. The Immigration Act of 1924 was the most severe: it limited the overall number of immigrants and established quotas based on nationality. Among other things, the act sharply reduced immigrants from Eastern Europe and Africa. And it completely restricted immigrants from Asia, except for Japan and the Philippines.


Then you just changed your tune on “welcoming” immigrants. Remember where you accused me of “lying”?

You mean Natural Law argument, made by this Catholic, pro-life judge?:

If you try to call him a “leftist”, I’m going to laugh at you. You might as well try to say it of Thomas Sowell.


New questions about caravan as migrants arrive in Tijuana
Nov. 15, 2018 - 7:44 - Tucker takes on Univision anchor Enrique Acevedo.


No, I mean Leftist immigration argument, and don’;t hide that filth behind Catholicism. Your viewpoints are about as Catholic as Stalin’s.

I am done talking to you. Your lies and responses make my stomach turn


And I mean Natural Law. Read the article, learn your heritage.

You don’t have to agree with it, but you don’t get to change history because you don’t like it.

That’s a leftist argument.