Mike Gallagher, talk show host, joins Rubio in giving amnesty


#1

Mike Gallagher, syndicated Radio Talk Show Host, has today jumped on the Rubio Band Wagon to allow 10-20 million foreigners who have invaded our borders to stay here, and stay in front of those who have been waiting for years to enter our Country legally.

Of course, Mr. Gallagher avoided giving an answer to his audience which addresses the most fundamental question which needs to be answered. How is it in the general welfare of the United States to allow 10-20 million foreigners who have invaded our borders to stay here who, for the most part, are uneducated, impoverished, many of whom are carriers of infectious and/or communicable disease and do not embrace our nation’s customs and culture and as statistics show, will mostly wind up on a federal or state welfare program? How does this promote the general welfare of the United States?

Tell us Mr. Gallager, why is it in the general welfare of the United States, to allow this group which has invaded our borders to remain in our country and be given special treatment while there are so many foreigners waiting for years to enter our country legally who are highly educated, financially self sufficient, are not sickly and do embrace our countries customs and culture?

In answer to your red herring charge, Mr. Gallager, that we can’t round these invaders up and deport them, what we can do is:

Make it a criminal offense to knowingly hire an illegal alien and strictly enforce that punishment!

When identifying a foreigner who has entered our country illegally, throw them in jail for at least six months doing hard labor to earn their food and shelter and them deport them.

Deny the children of illegal aliens access to our nation’s public school system and every federal and State welfare program.

Deny illegal aliens and their children accessed to our nation’s health care delivery system except in life or death situation.

Finally, let us take the advice of one of our nation’s founding fathers regarding immigration:

**Mr. BURKE *thought it of importance to fill the country with useful men, such as farmers, mechanics, and manufacturers, and, therefore, would hold out every encouragement to them to emigrate to America. This class he would receive on liberal terms; and he was satisfied there would be room enough for them, and for their posterity, for five hundred years to come. There was another class of men, whom he did not think useful, and he did not care what impediments were thrown in their way; such as your European merchants, and factors of merchants, who come with a view of remaining so long as will enable them to acquire a fortune, and then they will leave the country, and carry off all their property with them. These people injure us more than they do us good, and, except in this last sentiment, I can compare them to nothing but leeches. They stick to us until they get their fill of our best blood, and then they fall off and leave us. I look upon the privilege of an American citizen to be an honorable one, and it ought not to be thrown away upon such people. There is another class also that I would interdict, that is, the convicts and criminals which they pour out of British jails. I wish sincerely some mode could be adopted to prevent the importation of such; but that, perhaps, is not in our power; the introduction of them ought to be considered as a high misdemeanor. *** ___ Representative BURKE during our Nations` first debate on a RULE OF NATURALIZATION, FEB. 3RD, 1790

JWK

We are here today and gone tomorrow, but what is most important is what we do in between, and is what our children will inherit and remember us by.


#2

On today’s show Mike Gallagher had Rubio on to give him some “challenges” that he has been hearing so Rubio could give the “other side”. During the conversation with respect to the 10-20 million foreigners who have invaded our borders and the red herring assertion that we can’t deport them, Rubio insisted that if we implement e-verify they are not going to be able to work here, and if we don’t allow them to go on welfare “because we can‘t and we’re not going to” Rubio then asks “so then what do they do?” After laying out two important steps that should be immediately taken [e-verify and cutting off all welfare] which would encourage these invaders to start leaving on their own, Rubio’s concern, at this point in the conversation is “What are you going to do with the humanitarian stories that come out of that and the reality of it?”

What doesn’t add up here and Mike Gallagher failed to press Rubio on is, if we remove incentives which encourage foreigners to invade our borders [allowing them to take jobs away from American Citizens and refuse to give them welfare which American Citizens are taxed to provide] which will encourage them to leave on their own, Rubio’s concern is that we will then be scorned for acting in the general welfare of the united States. And instead of Mike Gallagher pressing Rubio on the fact that removing the incentives which encourage foreigners to invade our borders would go a long way toward self deportation, Mr. Gallagher is content to stay silent and move on to another softball “challenge”.

Tell us Mr. Gallagher, why did you not ask Rubio, how is it in the general welfare of the United States to allow 10-20 million foreigners who have invaded our borders to stay here who, for the most part, are uneducated, impoverished, many of whom are carriers of infectious and/or communicable disease and do not embrace our nation’s customs and culture and as statistics show, will mostly wind up on a federal or state welfare program? How does this promote the general welfare of the United States?

Tell us Mr. Gallagher, why is it in the general welfare of the United States, to allow this group which has invaded our borders to remain in our country and be given special treatment while there are so many foreigners waiting for years to enter our country legally who are highly educated, financially self sufficient, are not sickly and do embrace our countries customs and culture?

JWK

Reaching across the aisle is Washington Newspeak for a bipartisan agreement to subvert the Constitution and screw the American People.


#3

I was very disappointed that not one of Hannity’s guests who appeared on Friday’s show asked Rubio the most important question relating to the 10-20 million foreigners who have invaded our borders.

How is it in the general welfare of the United States to allow 10-20 million foreigners who have invaded our borders to stay here who, for the most part, are uneducated, impoverished, many of whom are carriers of infectious and/or communicable disease and do not embrace our nation’s customs and culture, and as statistics show, will mostly wind up on a federal or state welfare program? How does this promote the general welfare of the United States?

Why is it in the general welfare of the United States, Senator Rubio, to allow this group which has invaded our borders to remain in our country and be given special treatment while there are so many foreigners waiting for years to enter our country legally who are highly educated, financially self sufficient, are not sickly and do embrace our countries customs and culture?

For supportive documentation of statements made above concerning foreigners who have invaded our borders CLICK HERE for testimony given by JOAN ZINSER before the COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, DECEMBER 13, 1995

Also see:

Welfare Use by Immigrant Households with Children

Illegal Immigration Costs California Over Ten Billion Annually

Dateline: December, 2004

Among the key finding of the report are that the state’s already struggling K-12 education system spends approximately $7.7 billion a year to school the children of illegal aliens who now constitute 15 percent of the student body. Another $1.4 billion of the taxpayers’ money goes toward providing health care to illegal aliens and their families, the same amount that is spent incarcerating illegal aliens criminals.

Hearing focuses on costs linked to immigration Officials cite illegals’ effect on schools, criminal justice

Testimony about “51 Florida Hospitals in trouble” due to illegal aliens expenses

Texas Faces Rising Cost For Illegal Immigrant Care

Texas spent at least $250 million in the past year for medical care and imprisonment of illegal immigrants and other non-citizens.

L.A. Emergency Rooms Full of Illegal Immigrants

Mike Antonovich, the Los Angeles County supervisor, said the system has been "basically bankrupted."

The Department of Health has a $1.2 billion deficit. Caring for illegals is siphoning money from other services and forcing clinics, trauma centers and emergency rooms to close, he said.

Department of Education - Immigration Fiscal Impact Statement

(In 1982 the Supreme Court ruled that illegal immigrant children are entitled to the same education benefits available to U.S. citizens. An estimated 1.1 million public school students are illegal immigrants, according to the Urban Institute.)

Because these students require more services than the children of natives, they will naturally receive an even larger share of educational spending. It is not unreasonable to attribute 25 percent of all pre-K to 12 spending to the 19 percent of students who are immigrants or the children of immigrants.

Preventing and Controlling Tuberculosis Along the U.S.-Mexico Border

In 1999, Mexico was the country of origin for 23% (1,753) of all foreign-born persons with TB. Of TB cases among Mexican-born persons, three fourths were reported from the four U.S. states bordering Mexico: California, 820 cases; Texas, 364 cases; Arizona, 67 cases; and New Mexico, 17 cases (3). In 1999, TB cases among Mexican-born persons represented approximately 25% of all reported TB in the four border states. Incidence of TB was higher for the majority of border counties than the national TB rate.

Drug-resistant TB on the rise along US-Mexican border

According to the Centers for Disease Control and reported by McKay, to treat one case of multidrug-resistant TB will cost us (the taxpayers) $140,000 to as high as $700,000 per patient!

Is it not interesting how Rubio cleverly says that those covered under his plan will not be eligible for any “federal” welfare programs which obscures the reality that the various united States are the ones who are mostly burdened with the financial costs of this invading force, and even compelled by our Supreme Court to pay the education costs of foreigner’s children who have invaded their borders?

When will someone ask Rubio the really tough questions, stated above, regarding the general welfare of our nation and those who have invaded our borders?

One of the specific powers granted to Congress under Article 1, Section 8 with respect to the “common Defence and general Welfare of the United States” happens to be the power “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions. Has Congress not been delinquent in its duty to repel an ongoing invasion of our borders? Is it not time to forcefully encourage those who have entered our country illegally to leave and return to their country of origin? Are the following steps not justified to do so?

Make it a criminal offense with a severe penalty to knowingly hire an illegal alien, and strictly enforce that punishment!

When identifying a foreigner who has entered our country illegally, throw them in jail for at least six months doing hard labor to earn their food and shelter while incarcerated and them deport them.

Deny the children of those who have invaded our borders access to our nation’s public school system and every federal and State welfare program.

Deny illegal aliens and their children accessed to our nation’s health care delivery system except in life or death situation.

Will this not encourage those who have invaded our borders to return home and re-enter our country in a legal manner?

JWK

Reaching across the aisle is Washington Newspeak for a bipartisan agreement to subvert the Constitution and screw the American People.


#4

On today’s show, Mike Gallagher decided to double down on his support for Senator Rubio’s immigration bill and he continued to ignore why so many “conservatives” object to the bill, one conservative being Phyllis Schlafly who among many others Urge Senate to Dump Immigration Bill

***A coalition of conservative leaders has published an open letter denouncing the Senate’s bipartisan immigration-reform bill, calling it “bloated and unwieldy” and urging lawmakers to abandon it.

The letter, which the Coalition Against S.744 plans to release Tuesday, is signed by nearly 150 individuals. They include former Florida GOP Rep. Allen West; nationally syndicated radio host Laura Ingraham; Rich Lowry, editor of the National Review; Phyllis Schlafly, president of the Eagle Forum; Judson Phillips, founder of Tea Party Nation,; and tea party leaders in more than 25 states. ***

Mr. Gallagher used a clever straw man argument today to defend Rubio’s Bill. that we should not use demographics in the immigration debate which falsely implies those against Rubio’s immigration bill are against allowing Hispanics into the country. But the truth is, most conservatives against Rubio’s bill are against allowing 10 - 20 million foreigners who have invaded our borders to remain here who, for the most part, are poorly educated, many of whom are carriers of infectious and/or communicable disease and do not embrace our nation’s customs and culture, and, as statistics show, will mostly wind up on a federal or state welfare program.

***An unwillingness to work is not the reason immigrant welfare use is high. The vast majority (95 percent) of immigrant households with children had at least one worker in 2009. But their low education levels mean that more than half of these working immigrant households with children still accessed the welfare system during 2009. ***

Mike Gallagher also used the old and tired argument that we can’t round up and deport 10 million illegal aliens, which is not, to the best of my knowledge, being advocated by conservatives. What is being advocated is:

**Make it a criminal offense with a severe penalty to knowingly hire an illegal alien, and strictly enforce punishment!

When identifying a foreigner who has entered our country illegally, throw them in jail for at least six months doing hard labor to earn their food and shelter while incarcerated and them deport them.

Deny the children of those who have invaded our borders access to our nation’s public school system and every federal and State welfare program.

Deny illegal aliens and their children accessed to our nation’s health care delivery system except in life or death situations.**

Will this not encourage those who have invaded our borders to return to their country of origin and re-enter our country in a legal manner?

Tell us Mr. Gallagher, would these steps not encourage most of those who have entered our country illegally to go back to their country of origin and re-enter our country legally? Why do you continue to use silly arguments to defend Rubio’s immigration bill which does not promote the general welfare of the united States, but rather, panders to those who have invaded our borders?

JWK

A nation of people made dependent upon government for their subsistence, is a nation doomed to being enslaved by the iron fist of government which feeds them.


#5

Thanks John for keeping us current! I am extremely disappointed in republicans agreeing to grant amnesty to illegals.