More than 500,000 boycott Target over transgender bathroom policy


A conservative Christian activist group has gained more than half a million signatures and counting from people pledging to boycott Target over its transgender bathroom policy.
The petition started by the American Family Association on Wednesday raises concerns that Target’s inclusive stance on transgender rights encourages sexual predators and puts women and young girls in danger, because "a man can simply say he ‘feels like a woman today’ and enter the women’s restroom."
The boycott has more than 517,000 signatures as of Monday afternoon, marking it as one of AFA’s most popular campaigns.
“This is the best response we’ve ever had this quick,” says AFA President Tim Wildmon, attributing the protest’s viral nature to the fact that "everybody knows who Target is, and it’s an easy-to-understand issue."
Wildmon says Target stands “to lose a lot of customers who won’t come back.” But Target is standing by its policy.
“We certainly respect that there are a wide variety of perspectives and opinions,” says Target spokeswoman Molly Snyder. “As a company that firmly stands behind what it means to offer our team an inclusive place to work — and our guests an inclusive place to shop — we continue to believe that this is the right thing for Target.”

More than 500,000 boycott Target over transgender bathroom policy

Will Target go down the drain with this policy guaranteed to go against most people once they experience guys walking into women’s restrooms and preying on them.

When husbands are told some guy was in a woman’s restroom acting inappropriately and even taking pictures while pretending he is talking on the phone.

I see such a move is being advanced in Illinois to let perverts into bathrooms.


Well, Sam, at the risk of BEATING A DEAD HORSE (apparently a GELDING****) I wonder about a few things:

  1. Are a high percentage of these youth being raised by one parent (likely mom)?
  2. Are they those that also exhibit self destructive and/or suicidal tendencies?
  3. To what extent are they influenced by “social media” and the Internet?(HAH!)
  4. To what extent are drugs ,either recreational or prescribed, involved? Including alcohol?

Food for thought…
This is an attempt at understanding who and why…your thoughts are solicited.


I am not concerned so much with what circumstances that created the mental issue where some one thinks they are not the sex they were born with and focus on the idea that I do not want to have males in women’s bathrooms for safety’s sake and the realization that men pretending to be women are a danger to our women and children.

In turn I do not want some little boy molested in a men’s bathroom by some freak.


Kindly put,as always…
Nevertheless, this has reminded me that the CLINTON YEARS were known as “THE GOLDEN AGE OF PORNOGRAPHY”. As much of this perversity can be traced to the INTERNET, at least the broadcasting of it and proliferation, and a certain FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE has a good chance of becoming the next prez, can this not be the dawn of even more degeneracy in the US of A???
And a comment on those that are threatening to move to Canada if Trump is elected (Rosie O’Donnell for example) PISH AND TOSH! The liberal CANADIANS will open the door of FELLOWSHIP to them,no doubt. But after they get established, I can imagine there will be talk of a FENCE on their BORDER (ala Mexico) to keep out OUR UNDESIRABLES!!! If Mr Trump wins, I think LIBS should have to stay here and FACE THE MUSIC!!!



Trump is a flaming Liberal who supports these pedophile enabling changes like letting men use the girls bathroom, the flow of Liberals across the Canadian border if Trump wins will be South Bound.


According to the radio yesterday, the number of signatures was up to 864,000.


Let me get this straight: Some Tranny wants to go into the girls bathroom and since he is BI as many of the Tranny’s are then he thinks he has a RIGHT to be in there and so does Target.

1 screwball Tranny changes an entire nation of 330 million people, what are we crazy.


I was just reading Target has lost a lot of revenue over this decision.


The Queer/Pedophile Mafia has certainly been racking up some big wins lately but they are deranged in every way, not just in their perverted sexual desires; that means they will see these wins as a reason to crank it up instead of drifting back for awhile and letting the dust settle.

That will be their undoing, they just assume that because force worked in the past there is no limit to how many times they can use force; a backlash is brewing and these perverts will not be pleased with the results they glean from spitting in the face of most of the population.

Target is still playing by the old rules which said the best course was to capitulate with the Perverts to keep them from protesting your business, but the new rules are that everyone is watching much closer and understand how these strong-arm tactics work; soon the Corporate “bean counters” will see that capitulation is costing them more than having standard decency in their bathroom policy.

Which is ALL GOOD!


If I recall correctly, the last I heard, their stock had gone down to the tune of $2.5 billion.


The first rule of problem solving is to ensure there is a problem to begin with. So, someone favoring Target’s policy please explain to me the problem the Target policy addresses. I’m totally unaware of a problem with current bathroom assignment protocol based on the “junk” in your trunk

The first rule of rule making is to propose a solution/rule that is enforceable. So, can Target explain precisely how they intend to enforce their new policy?

The absurdity of this fiasco is mind-blowing.

Prediction: Target’s policy will wilt as the $100 million molestation/indecent exposure lawsuits begin to roll in.

What the hell is next - perhaps Target will run gynecological/psychological gender surveys and “short-arm” inspections as part of their bathroom protocol??


Meh; wouldn’t put credit in this line of thinking, considering that, for years “fridge-like mothers” was the explanation for Autistic children.

More likely, they just have a hormone-imbalance.


Here is the problem RET. We are just about out of lines to cross, the last (?) line being what we have referred to as child molestation.

Back in the 60’s there was a gay movement much like today but it never got the attention due to the Vietnam war. I had the fortune or misfortune to be in a Social Sciences class that had a couple of gays in it and they beat the drum loud and clear being allowed by our far left Prof. Also at that time NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) was open in there demands and propaganda.

Its called ‘North American’ because it is a global organization.

After many years of below the radar I see they are now back: in the past they had a floating website which changed its IP on a regular basis so it could not be tracked or found easily.

In the 60’s they proposed sex with children, all children at any age that a child was capable of giving consent and love. They claimed age 5 IIRC.

There was and is no shortage of NAMBLA members in political offices across the US from city to Federal and Congress has many supporters or it would never have gotten this far. Sex with children is a global problem and here in the US its a major problem that the govt has either looked the other way or condoned by omission of condemnation.

Our Federal govt has become the leading advocate for deviant sex and has used its power for force it upon America by supporting it and giving it “minority and protective class” status. With that comes a massive amount of federal support, job/hiring preference, federal grants and low % rate loan programs, federal funds for schooling at not cost no payback, massive federal financial and public support and finally endorsement and validation of their sexual perversion(s).

When the door opens you cannot just let one minority in, you can not allow blacks but keep out Mexicans and then allow Mexicans and then keep out Asians, allow gays but keep out lesbians, allow lesbians and then keep out transgenders and not allow Bi’s, so what is left? Sex with children, just another perversion and there is no way a liberal govt will keep them out, in fact wining this case in court will be easy…



Doesn’t appear there stock has done anything out of the ordinary. For the month their stock is down about $2.


We’re not out of lines. There is still sex-slavery for children; and snuff-encounters, based on that control/power/bondage model. Pick your victim, probably a child or adolescent, and get your rocks off and strangle the hoor.

We could move on from there to human sacrifice or cannibalism; or any number of other dystopian outrages. There will always be greater lines to cross…but it all depends on having CLASSES and LEVELS OF STATUS. That some people have control and hold the power of life and death, over their lessers.

Such societies don’t last long; but Liberals reject human history, too. We are going the way of Rome; but we’re going faster and going to hit bottom harder.


Rome? As in the scandal of little boys and the Catholic Church?

If you’re going to address perversion, why not address them all?


The Catholic Church’s problems are no more Representative of any organization of it’s size; compared to Schools or after-school centers, the latter are far worse.

Catholic Church has a bigger issue in suicides, but that for some reason isn’t the cultural meme they’re stuck with.


No. Rome as in the nation-state which rose, unified all of what is now Europe, and then fell - of its own moral bankruptcy and degeneracy.

The Catholic Church does not promote pedophilia or sexual deviancy. No…it is liberals, who don’t like EXCLUDING obvious poor candidates for the priesthood, who planted that seed - and rejoiced at the harvest.

The Church, if you’d read the Scriptures and its history you’d know, stands OPPOSED to the sexual anarchy and celebration of deviance that Lefties so love.


csbrown seems to be playing the circle game again.
We are in moral anarchy and it seems North Carolina is to be challenged by the feds. I just hope McCrory is strong enough to stand up to the vile pedophilic forces against him.


So an organization dedicated to the worship of* GOD* that has a problem with it’s members engaging in pedophilia is the same as an after school center? LOL. I don’t think think so. And let’s be clear, this isn’t just about some troubled individuals acting out on their own. This is about an orginization that became aware of what priests were doing and not only chose to hide the fact from the authorities, but reassigned priests where they were exposed to children.

It’s a cruel meme that they hid the fact that priests were diddling children? Archbishop Bernard Law fled the US because of what he knew after a scathing report; “the Archdiocese has shown an institutional reluctance to adequately address the problem and, in fact, made choices that allowed the abuse to continue,” but did not allege that Law had tried to evade investigation. And he did state that Cardinal Law had not broken any laws, because the law requiring abuse to be reported was not expanded to include priests until 2002."

The only point I’m making by calling out the Catholic Church is to point out peoples selective outrage.