Report: UK police had Savile abuse records in '60s


#1

Report: UK police had Savile abuse records in '60s
3/11/13

LONDON (AP) – An independent report into how British police handled allegations against disgraced late BBC entertainer Jimmy Savile said Tuesday that police held records that connected him to sexual abuse as early as 1964, but failed to carry out an investigation.

The earliest found intelligence record held by the pedophile unit at Scotland Yard dates from about 1964, but was only uncovered last year, the report said. The record, which just contained brief notes, referred to Savile as a “well known disc jockey” and to sexual abuse involving students at a children’s home. No investigation was carried out as a result of that intelligence, the report said.

“Its existence suggests that, by 1964, Savile was known to (police) officers investigating sexual offences against children,” the report said. “On the basis of what we know now, there appears to have been, at the very least, an opportunity to investigate his behavior then.”

The second intelligence record was an anonymous letter sent to police in 1998. It urged Scotland Yard to stop Savile’s activities, but police marked it as “sensitive” because of his celebrity status. It was never investigated and not shared with other police forces.

It would be very interesting to know how much Savile was shielded by his celebrity, and how much his peccadilloes were overlooked due to various cultural factors. This article doesn’t go there, unfortunately. Part of sexual predators’ SOP seems to be a knowledge of how to manipulate people to select, get to and manipulate their targets, to manipulate people so as not to get caught, and minimize or avoid consequences when caught.


#2

Celebrities… most are worthless wastes of human dna. I’m really tired of the celebrity worshiping culture.


#3

Actually, a lot of that is true of sexual predators in general.


#4

Part of sexual predators’ SOP seems to be a knowledge of how to manipulate people to select, get to and manipulate their targets, to manipulate people so as not to get caught, and minimize or avoid consequences when caught.

Actually, a lot of that is true of sexual predators in general.

I wrote that first sentence with a particular person in mind, one who is predatory sexually but without breaking the law. A family member had to deal with him - not as one of his targets - and some of the destruction he caused. It seems to take a certain set of character flaws and a certain set of interpersonal “skills” to live and maintain (for some reason they don’t wear their Pervs Unanimous name tag in public) a predatory lifestyle.