Saudi Newspaper: Obama Is the Weakest President In The History Of The U.S.


#1

According to an op-ed in the London daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, Barack Obama is the weakest president in the history of the United States.
MEMRI reported:In his May 21, 2013 column, Mashari Al-Zaydi, columnist for the London-based Saudi daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, harshly criticized President Barack Obama and his foreign policy, particularly as it relates to the crisis in Syria.
Al-Zaydi wrote that Obama’s handling of the Syrian crisis had proven his failure as president, showing him as completely lacking in leadership ability, hesitant and diffident, and overall the weakest president in the history of the United States. He added that it is because of these failings that Obama allowed the crisis in Syria to escalate to the current situation, and that it is he who “caused the wound to become deeper and the bloodshed to continue.” He also stated that Obama’s hesitant and failed leadership in the Middle East, and especially in Syria, had laid the groundwork for the development of extremism and sectarian violence greater than those of Al-Qaeda.

Snip:

“The most acute [aspect of] the problem is that Obama is laying down the systematic groundwork for the development of extremism and sectarian violence that will make us miss the Al-Qaeda of George W. Bush’s era, while deluding himself that he eliminated Al-Qaeda when he killed Osama bin Laden!”

Saudi Newspaper: Obama Is the Weakest President In The History Of The U.S. | The Gateway Pundit
Apparently it is not only Americans that see Obama as weak but an enabler for terrorism to spread.


#2

This is news?

Anyone with a brain knows this.


#3

Not only the “weakest” but the WORST


#4

Most corrupt.


#5

Warren Harding, Teapot Dome.
Everyone always forgets Teapot Dome…


#6

Defending 0bama to the end?


#7

For the Saudis to be classifying Obama as weak, there must be something under the surface that is not showing. The Saudis are some of the biggest supporters (financially and logistically) of global terrorism. For them to be yelling about Obama not doing enough for Syria, there must be something that they are being denied in some way by this prolonged civil war. They want the US to intervene because it would somehow benefit them. Mark my words…


#8

I give more credence to this article than anything written by the lame stream media in America.


#9

[quote=“drazor2, post:7, topic:39632”]
For the Saudis to be classifying Obama as weak, there must be something under the surface that is not showing. The Saudis are some of the biggest supporters (financially and logistically) of global terrorism. For them to be yelling about Obama not doing enough for Syria, there must be something that they are being denied in some way by this prolonged civil war. They want the US to intervene because it would somehow benefit them. Mark my words…
[/quote]Obama is sending in military aid to Syria and now The Saudis are providing missiles to the rebels.

Saudi Arabia wants missiles for Syrian rebels: report | News , Middle East | THE DAILY STAR

Since the rebels have pledged alligance to Al Qaeda, guess who benefits? The whole region has changed with Obama’s help while he works to weaken America


#10

Obama is much worse!