Which is absolutely true, there was no meaningful contact with the Russian Government as evidenced by your attempts to say that the female attorney WHO OBAMA BROUGHT IN TO MEET WITH DEMOCRATS is somehow the equivalent of Putin’s right arm.
And the absolute COMPLETE LACK of evidence that ANY MEANINGFUL INFORMATION was passed to the Trump campaign is another fact that screams “Fake News” is all you have.
And of course the kicker, even if Putin himself had handed Trump a file with 100 different pieces of evidence of Clinton’s crimes it would still be absolutely legal and appropriate for Trump to take that file and create a thousand campaign commercials describing what was in them.
Only the parts that were your analysis.
Name them please, with the quotes (not your opinion of what his quotes meant)
He did meet with the lawyer, she is in no way tied to Russian Intelligence, her opinion of who Putin was rooting for is just as meaningless as yours or mine.
You have NO evidence that she is in any way tied to Putin or that she had ANY information that was not already well known by the Wikileaks dump, the fact that she claimed she had some good dirt is meaningless just as it would be if she did indeed have some good dirt. Trump Jr. was meeting her anyway and there is nothing wrong with checking out her claims on Clinton dirt in the process, in fact; any person in any campaign should be fired if they did not check out such a claim.
Please list the quotes, (not your opinion of what the quotes meant)
You mean like leveling blatant accusations with no evidence based only on fake news while simultaneously supporting an opposing candidate who committed Treason and lied continually about it for a year and that has been PROVED by the FBI who presented the evidence to Congress?
Physician heal thyself.
Nor is ANY dirt that ANY campaign discovers EVER “Reported to officials” unless and until the timing is right for the campaign that has the dirt.
None of which is relevant in this case because there is no evidence that Russia had anything relevant or helpful so what exactly would that “report” have consisted of?
***“Hello, FBI? This is the Trump campaign calling, we just received a non specific offer for some dirt on Hillary Clinton that might help our campaign, the woman says that she got it from Russian Officials who would like to see us win; just thought we should let you know in case you wanted to intercept the information and hide it next to all the other evidence against Clinton that you are already ignoring” ***
Except for evidence which does not exist, and a motive for covering up a perfectly appropriate and legal activity that every campaign has always done because that is how campaigns operate.
I would like to know what you are seeing that “appears to be a coverup”, you cannot even define a law that might have been broken as you condemn the entire Trump circle in the absolute.
All the while ignoring the EVIDENCE that is on full display proving that the candidate YOU supported committed multiple felonies and Treason against the United States by secretly trafficking in classified information in exchange for laundered political contributions to her own campaign.
And lets not forget, LYING ABOUT IT CONTINUALLY EVEN AS THE EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED TO CONGRESS.
That is an interesting albeit indefensible definition of “Morality”.
Why would he? The “meeting” netted NOTHING; the Trumps are business family and anyone in business knows that you don’t waste your superiors time discussing every dead end that you checked out.
In fact, that is precisely WHY you have underlings in charge of stuff like this; to toss out the dross and keep the gold.
Russia is a “Nothing Burger”, nobody ever said that they did not meet with any Russians (They said that they did not collude with the Russian Government in hacking our election), and it is ALL “Fake News” since there is;
NO suggestion that any identifiable law has been broken
NO indication that any information that was helpful was ever offered or used by the Trump campaign
NO law that would have been broken even if there had been information offered that was helpful
Since the only candidate in the previous election that is known to be guilty of this is the one you supported…Are you saying that you are a sucker for continuing to believe in the fake news that the other supporters of your candidate keep offering?
Session’s has not lied, your attempt to say that a handshake in a room full of people is the equivalent of a “meeting” is not convincing anyone that Sessions is less of an honest man; it is only convincing people that those who are claiming Sessions “Lied” are not honest men.
And you will be disappointed again just like all of the character assassins who have thrown their lot in with the corrupt side, and I would bet that none of you will ever repent for any of it.