Which is why I didn’t ask you
I didn’t use the word “off-limits”, it’s just an issue that we already know we disagree on to some degree, which is to say I agree with you in some respects, but not others. That said, if the only immoral behavior of Dems is that they’d allow abortion as it has been for almost 50 years, I’d say that’s not so bad.
In other words, I was looking for more than the “go-to” argument.
Not sure what’s wrong with allowing people to make personal choices.
There are issues that enter the public sphere, bathrooms, and sports for example, but I think in our conversations you’d punish everyone out of fear of what a few unscrupulous people might do. Sorry, that’ not a compelling argument to me.
In the case of bathrooms, it’s already illegal to invade people’s privacy.
In the case of sports, you want to prevent all transgenders from playing because a few cisgender men (men who pretend to be women to win) might try to infiltrate sports.
That’s called cheating and it happens in all sports at all levels. In competitive sports (at higher levels) and the Olympics, trans men who become women are limited to a certain amount of testosterone. In powerlifting, Trans women are excluded because the bone density and muscle mass isn’t something that vanishes when a person becomes transgender.
But it is part of your religion.