So when Clinton said he didn’t have sex with Lewinski, if I tried to make a distinction between oral and normal sex, you wouldn’t have perceived my interpretation of those events as dishonest?
Not all opinions are “reasoned”. Some are quite unreasonable.
For instance, I was highly critical of Clinton trying to claim he didn’t have sex with Lewinski. My reasoned opinion at that time was he knew that oral sex is sex and he was exploiting the law (specifically that it must be demonstrated that when you lie about something you know it’s a lie).
An example of an unreasonable opinion is to conclude that Trump wasn’t lying when he said: "“If you look at President Obama and other presidents, most of them didn’t make calls,”
If you are really interested in debating me on the topic, address what I said, demonstrate how my opinion about what the president said is, in fact, unreasonable.