That’s an interesting response. It was not all that long ago that you practically condemned hundreds of thousands of priests to hell as pedophiles, without a single court case in a court of law, in my thread about the Catholic church. No proof, no trials, no jury, just condemnation.
But in this case, @csbrown28 csbrown openly and willingly enables all the evils I spoke of.
@csbrown28 is NOW trying to draw a line of distinction between himself and those he supports and enables. I am sorry but that does not fly.
Think about it: You cannot support evil and evil people, enable evil and evil people, vote for evil and evil people, and even donate to evil and evil people, and then turn around and say "Oh, but am not evil like they are."
I understand if someone is mad at me or my style of posting. I can wrap my head around that. But there is no way that any rational person can accept the twisted logic of someone saying “Those politicians may be evil but I am not” when that person supports them and their evil, votes them and their evil, enables them and their evil, and donates to them and their evil,
That just does not pass the credibility test.
You are 99% over on brown’s side already so I do not expect a reasonable response from you. By the way, do you dialogue much with klansmen and nazis? I doubt it.