Whoa . . . whoa . . . whoa, dude. Back up a second.
This is the second time you’ve made one of these incredibly huge leaps, this one concluding in unrelated melodrama. The first time was here: President Trump carries through with America First immigration policy
My simple ‘yes’ did not cast doubt upon your character, nor on your Mother (that’s not my style) . . . nor do I know anything . . . zilch, zip, nada . . . about F-16’s, 18’s, range, etc. You and FC can argue all you want about that stuff, and for all I know, the range of those things could be a gazillion miles. I have no idea.
Once again, I have no idea how you made the pole vault to issues about “honor”, 9/11, “16 years of people telling me that my Mother is a traitor” (that one was particularly melodramatic), Benghazi, your “buttons”, etc., from my simple ‘yes’.
So, what was my ‘yes’ actually regarding? I was agreeing with FC that you project “an air of superiority in your arguments” to the point of being obnoxious.
I can’t put my finger on it, but there’s something about your approach to “debate” that just rubs me the wrong way.
Am I calling your baby ugly? Yes . . . this is the Internet . . . big deal. I’m sure that’s happened before . . . and it’s certainly happened to me plenty of times. Just as you do for me, I myself rub some people the wrong way too. Again . . . big wup.
I do not hold your arguments, nor your method of making them, in high regard. To be fair, some of what you say may hold water, but I’ve long since written you off as not credible, so anything you say now is tainted by that opinion.
If I had to choose a person to represent my arguments, it would NOT be you. If I had to choose a person to repel others . . . it would be YOU.
I would not have made a post such as this if it hadn’t been for your “calling foul”.