Why cant we get this type of bill introduced in Congress?



To return integrity to the Congress of the United States by ending un-constitutional Federal expenditures to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.

*Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1**.** Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “Ending un-constitutional Federal Funding to Planned Parenthood Act of 2017”.

SEC. 2. Findings.

Congress finds the following:

(1) That a fundamental principle of constitutional construction requires an adherence to the text of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent, which gives context to its text.

(2) That after reading the text of our Constitution and reviewing the debates during which time our Constitution was framed and ratified, there is no wording which can be pointed to authorizing Congress to tax for and appropriate federal revenue to an entity which provides medical services to people within a State’s borders.

(3) That to continue such funding is to engage in a misappropriation of federal revenue, allows Congress to exercise a power not granted, and this in turn creates a factious entity that bribes complicit members of Congress through political contributions and corrupts the very foundation of our system of government.

SEC. 3. Now, therefore

(1) Upon passage of this Act in Congress Assembled and the President’s approval, there shall be no more federal revenue appropriated from the Treasury of the United States to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.,or its affiliates.

SEC. 4. Rule of Construction.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to forbid Federal funding of Congress’ constitutionally authorized functions.


Because Liberals who care nothing about life and in fact where it up to them post birth abortion by at least 1 week would be fully legal.

Since 1973 it is est there have been 58 MILLION abortions. IN that group were a future POTUS, a Justice on SCOTUS, a Cancer researcher that discovered the cure for breast cancer just to name a few…



I think there is a much bigger but concealed reason why Congress does not want to end funding for Planned Parenthood. The vast majority of those in Congress have no intention to end such funding because it is a cash cow for our Congress critters which rakes in millions upon millions in campaign contributions from those opposed, and those in favor of such funding.

Ending federal spending and borrowing for the social needs of the people within the various States would also end countless factious and dangerous groups which plague the Halls of Capitol Hill for a chance to bribe members of Congress with political campaign donations. One group favoring federal spending for a specific social cause, while another donor group protests such federal expenditures, but in the end, it is a corrupted and evil majority in Congress which knowingly and willingly is benefiting from donors on both sides.

Keep in mind, to avoid these kinds of political factions on a national scale ___ factions which may be identified as tax-payers vs tax-getters ___ our wise founders refused to delegate a power to Congress over those “… objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.” These “objects” were specifically and intentionally left to the discretion of the people within each State! See, Federalist No. 45.

Unfortunately, with countless “entitlements” having been unconstitutionally created by Congress which now finance the personal economic needs of the people within the various state borders, our national unfunded debt liability has risen to an estimated $125 TRILLION.

And who are some of the other identifiable factions who may be characterized as tax-getters? Federally subsidized health-care recipients; federally subsidized food stamp recipients; federally subsidized Section Eight Housing recipients; federally funded unemployment benefit recipients; federally funded student loans and grant recipients; and millions of foreigners who have invaded America’s borders who are also the recipients of free government cheese.

If we don’t end Congress’ love affair with financing the social needs and desires of the people within the various state borders, and end federal tax-payer vs tax-getter redistribution policies, we are destined to suffer the same fate as Venezuela, Chile, and other socialist countries which, instead of protecting the people’s inalienable right to succeed or fail at their own hand, have succumbed to using government force to steal the product of one person’s labor which is then transferred to another individual or group for their personal economic needs ___ a practice which in fact is an immoral use of government force.


Obamacare by consent of the governed, Article 5, our Constitution`s amendment process. Tyranny by a majority vote in Congress or a Supreme Court’s majority vote***


Because few support the Constitution or agree about the purpose of a government as outlined in the Declaration of Independence. It seems that most believe that the government is here to enhance their lives, keep them completely safe and secure and to create prosperity. We could build an extensive list of bills that ought to go before Congress. We shouldn’t need to make them bills. The Supreme Court should declare programs like this unconstitutional. Congress won’t introduce bills like this for the same reason the Supreme Court and the executive branch won’t follow the Constitution. The Supreme Court is probably the best shot at making the Constitution stick, but it doesn’t do its job as well as it ought. We could make a very long list of its failures too.


I guess one of the reasons why we can’t get a bill to end unconstitutional funding to Planned Parenthood is, our pro-life voters will not present such a bill to their members in the House and demand they support it.


"To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen [a working person’s earned wage] and with the other to bestow upon favored individuals, [[COLOR=red]Planned Parenthood] to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes is none the less a robbery because it is done under forms of law and called taxation." ____ Savings and Loan Association. v.Topeka,(1875).[/COLOR]


The Democrat/Statist Wing of the Republican Party, headed up by Susan Collins from a purple state, refuses to back defunding of Planned Parenthood. When you have only a two member majority in the Senate you must have virtually all hands on deck. We don’t have the numbers.

Elections have consequences.


True. Especially so when there are a number of “Republicans” who aren’t any more republican than Barack Obama.


From where I stand that is no excuse for Republicans in Congress who claim to be “pro life” and allege to support our Constitution and a limited federal government. The few who are sincere need to introduce such a bill and then ask people who are “pro life” supporters to no longer donate to Republicans who don’t co-sponsor the Bill. As Pappadave correctly points out, there are a number of Republicans in Congress “who aren’t any more republican than Barack Obama”. And yet, they are still receiving donor money from pro-life and limited government contributors.

I would like to see the Freedom Caucus introduce such a bill and then go on as many radio talk shows and challenge our phony baloney “Republicans” to put their name on the bill, i.e. put up or shut up!

The same should be done with federal funding for the production of “art”!